ReviewCureus2022
The Effectiveness and Safety of Metformin Compared to Sulfonylureas in Diabetic Nephropathy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of AMPK signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with its complications and related metabolic disorders.Metabolism open · 2025Review
- Disease Progression Modeling of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR): A Pharmacometrics Approach.Journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- The association between duration of metformin and sulfonylurea treatment and microvascular complications in patients with incident type 2 diabetes: a pooled cohort analysis.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metformin and sulphonylureas are the most commonly used first-line anti-diabetic agents. However, medical practice guidelines and clinical experience caution against using these drugs in severe diabetic kidney disease. Consequently, the choice of anti-diabetic medicine in various stages of diabetic nephropathy should balance the benefits and risks to the patient. We aim to synthesize available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of metformin concerning sulfonylureas in patients with diabetic renal disease. The COSMOS-E (Guidance on conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of etiology) and MOOSE (Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines were followed when designing the systematic review. The present study assessed the effectiveness of metformin and sulphonylurea monotherapy regarding renal function. Studies published from 2001 to 2022 were included. We have identified 570 records from PubMed, BioMed Central, LILACS (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde), ScienceDirect, and PLoS (The Public Library of Science) Medicine databases. Eight cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported adjusted hazard ratios with confidence limits. Metformin was found to be more effective in the following events: all-cause mortality, GFR (glomerular filtration rate), ESRD (end-stage renal disease) or death events, one-year risk of death or end-stage renal disease, cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalization, and hypoglycemic episodes. However, metformin was less effective in acute renal replacement therapy, end-stage renal disease, and/or death, with a one-year risk of acute dialysis. Lactic acidosis was not significant with metformin. The present study recommends that metformin therapy is safe compared to sulfonylurea therapy in diabetic nephropathy patients, provided that the contraindications given in the guidelines are strictly adhered to.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.