Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36627963›Full record

ArticleGlobal & regional health technology assessment

Valorization of clinical trials from the Italian National Health Service perspective: definition and first application of a model to estimate avoided costs.

Americo Cicchetti, Domenico Addesso, Filippo E Leone, Antonino Amato, Luca Angerame, Angelo D'Aversa, Mario Fraticelli, Carlo Nicora, Eleonora Sfreddo, Mariangela Fumarola and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global & regional health technology assessment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The economic impact of compassionate use of medicines.BMC health services research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Americo CicchettiAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome - Italy.
Domenico AddessoAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome - Italy.
Filippo E LeoneAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome - Italy.
Antonino AmatoAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome - Italy.
Luca AngerameAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome - Italy.
Angelo D'AversaFondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome - Italy.
Mario FraticelliAzienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII di Bergamo, Bergamo - Italy.
Carlo NicoraFondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia - Italy.
Eleonora SfreddoFondazione per la Ricerca, Ospedale di Bergamo, Bergamo - Italy.
Mariangela FumarolaFondazione per la Ricerca, Ospedale di Bergamo, Bergamo - Italy.
Roberta PorcinoAzienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII di Bergamo, Bergamo - Italy.
Gabriella CoccioloRoche S.p.A., Monza (MB) - Italy.
Simona ReRoche S.p.A., Monza (MB) - Italy.
Sergio ScaccabarozziRoche S.p.A., Monza (MB) - Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: From the perspective of healthcare organizations and public health care systems, the value of a clinical trial can be assessed from a clinical and economical perspective. However, to date, there is no standardized model for systematically capturing the economic value of clinical trials at organizational and system levels. The aim of this study was to develop and test a methodology for estimating the avoided costs deriving from the management of patients as part of a clinical trial. Methods: Our methodology is based on the assumption that the economic value of a clinical trial derives from 1) the funding received by the experimental site from a trial's sponsor, and from 2) the cost avoided by the experimental site with the treatment of patients within a study and not according to standard care by the experimental site. Results: By applying the methodology to onco-hematological clinical trials conducted in two academic hospitals from 2011 to 2016, we demonstrate that savings between 2 million and 4 million euros were achieved over a five-year period. Thus, for every 1,000 euros invested by the pharmaceutical company into the clinical studies conducted at these hospitals, the hospitals saved on average 2,200 euros due to costs not incurred as a result of the trials. Conclusions: The study has proposed and tested a methodology for estimating the economic value of clinical trials by taking into account avoided costs deriving from the treatment of patients enrolled in sponsored trials. The study has proposed a management tool for healthcare institutions to govern clinical trials.

Indexed as

Avoided costsClinical trialsHealthcare management

Identifiers

PMID36627963
PMCPMC9677598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.