Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36627869›Full record

ArticleGlobal & regional health technology assessment

Price and reimbursement for orphan medicines and managed entry agreements: does Italy need a framework?

Claudio Jommi, Antonio Addis, Nello Martini, Elena Nicod, Marcello Pani, Annalisa Scopinaro, Sabine Vogler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global & regional health technology assessment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudio JommiCergas SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan - Italy.
Antonio AddisDepartment of Epidemiology, Regional Health Service (Regione Lazio) Member of the Scientific Technical Committee, Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), Rome - Italy.
Nello MartiniFondazione ReS (Research and Health Foundation), Rome - Italy.
Elena NicodDolon Ltd, London - UK.
Marcello PaniAgostino Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, Rome - Italy.
Annalisa ScopinaroUNIAMO (Italian Federation for Rare Diseases), Rome - Italy.
Sabine VoglerWHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Austrian National Public Health Institute (GÖG), Vienna - Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article illustrates a consensus opinion of an expert panel on the need and usefulness of a framework for price and reimbursement (P&R) process and managed entry agreements (MEAs) for orphan medicines in Italy. This opinion was gathered in three rounds: an introductory document was sent to the panel and discussed during a recorded online meeting. A second document was sent to the panel for their review. In the third step the final document was validated. Members of the expert panel are the authors of the article. The panel agreed that Italy does not need a specific value framework for orphan medicines, driving the P&R process. Rather, a more structured value framework for all medicines tailored to the specific drugs can be useful. For orphan drugs, the panel advocated for a multidisciplinary approach and the contribution of different stakeholders to value assessment, and acknowledged the importance of addressing, more than for other drugs, unmet needs, equity issues and societal value. The panel raised the need of increasing the importance of patient-reported outcomes. Experts, acknowledging the growing criticisms in implementation of outcome-based agreements in Italy, expressed their position against their abandonment in favour of discounts only and supported orphan medicines as natural candidates for these agreements. Finally, the panel made some recommendations on the appraisal process for orphan medicines, including an early discussion on the uncertainty of the evidence generated and the adoption of a structured approach to identify the agreement, which better responds to the uncertainty.

Indexed as

ItalyManaged entry agreementsOrphan medicinesValue framework

Identifiers

PMID36627869
PMCPMC9616180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.