Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36627646›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2023

Acute toxicities and cumulative dose to the brain of repeated sessions of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases: a retrospective study of 184 patients.

L Kuntz, C Le Fèvre, D Jarnet, A Keller, P Meyer, A Thiery, H Cebula, G Noel, D Antoni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reirradiation of recurrent brain tumors: a review by the ESTRO CNS Focus Group.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L KuntzRadiation Therapy University Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France. l.kuntz@icans.eu.
C Le FèvreRadiation Therapy University Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
D JarnetMedical Physics Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
A KellerRadiation Therapy University Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
P MeyerMedical Physics Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
A ThieryMedical Information Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 3 rue de la Porte de L'Hôpital, 67065, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
H CebulaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, 1 Avenue Molière, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
G NoelRadiation Therapy University Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France. g.noel@icans.eu.
D AntoniRadiation Therapy University Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17 rue Albert Calmette, 67200, Strasbourg, France.
Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is a focal treatment for brain metastases (BMs); thus, 20 to 40% of patients will require salvage treatment after an initial SRT session, either because of local or distant failure. SRT is not exempt from acute toxicity, and the acute toxicities of repeated SRT are not well known. The objective of this study was to analyze the acute toxicities of repeated courses of SRT and to determine whether repeated SRT could lead to cumulative brain doses equivalent to those of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween 2010 and 2020, data from 184 patients treated for 915 BMs via two to six SRT sessions for local or distant BM recurrence without previous or intercurrent WBRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were seen via consultations during SRT, and the delivered dose, the use of corticosteroid therapy and neurological symptoms were recorded and rated according to the CTCAEv4. The dosimetric characteristics of 79% of BMs were collected, and summation plans of 76.6% of BMs were created.

results36% of patients developed acute toxicity during at least one session. No grade three or four toxicity was registered, and grade one or two cephalalgy was the most frequently reported symptom. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of acute toxicity between consecutive SRT sessions. In the multivariate analysis, acute toxicity was associated with the use of corticosteroid therapy before irradiation (OR = 2.6; p = 0.01), BMV grade (high vs. low grade OR = 5.17; p = 0.02), and number of SRT sessions (3 SRT vs. 2 SRT: OR = 2.64; p = 0.01). The median volume equivalent to the WBRT dose (V

conclusionRepeated SRT for local or distant recurrent BM is well tolerated, without grade three or four toxicity, and does not cause more acute neurological toxicity with repeated SRT sessions. Moreover, even for patients treated for more than ten BMs, the V

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAdrenal Cortex HormonesBrainCranial IrradiationHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesAcute toxicityBrain metastasesRepeated radiosurgerySalvage radiationSide effectStereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID36627646
PMCPMC9830690
OpenAlexW4313909708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.