Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36627566›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2023

Team-based primary care reforms and older adults: a descriptive assessment of sociodemographic trends and prescribing endpoints in two Canadian provinces.

Nichole Austin, David Rudoler, Sara Allin, Lisa Dolovich, Richard H Glazier, Agnes Grudniewicz, Elisabeth Martin, Caroline Sirois, Erin Strumpf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research data use in a digital society: a deliberative public engagement.International journal of population data science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nichole AustinDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. nichole.austin@dal.ca.
David RudolerOntario Tech University, Oshawa, Canada.
Sara AllinUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lisa DolovichUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Richard H GlazierInstitute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada.
Agnes GrudniewiczUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Elisabeth MartinUniversité Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
Caroline SiroisUniversité Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
Erin StrumpfMcGill University, Montreal, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAUniversité Laval · CADalhousie University · CAMcGill University · CAOntario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR PJT156326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeam-based primary care reforms aim to improve care coordination by involving multiple interdisciplinary health professionals in patient care. Team-based primary care may support improved medication management for older adults with polypharmacy and multiple points of contact with the healthcare system. However, little is known about this association. This study compares sociodemographic and prescribing trends among older adults in team-based vs. traditional primary care models in Ontario and Quebec.

methodsWe constructed two provincial cohorts using population-level health administrative data from 2006-2018. Our primary exposure was enrollment in a team-based model of care. Key endpoints included adverse drug events (ADEs), potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs), and polypharmacy. We plotted prescribing trends across the observation period (stratified by model of care) in each province. We used standardized mean differences to compare characteristics of older adults and providers, as well as prescribing endpoints.

resultsFormal patient/physician enrollment increased in both provinces since the time of policy implementation; team-based enrollment among older adults was higher in Quebec (47%) than Ontario (33%) by the end of our observation period. The distribution of sociodemographic characteristics was reasonably comparable between team-based and non-team-based patients in both provinces, aside from a persistently higher share of rural patients in team-based care. Most PIPs assessed either declined or remained relatively steady over time, regardless of model of care and province. Several PIPs were more common among team-based patients than non-team-based patients, particularly in Quebec. We did not detect notable trends in ADEs or polypharmacy in either province.

conclusionsOur findings offer encouraging evidence that many PIPs are declining over time in this population, regardless of patients' enrollment in team-based care. Rates of decline appear similar across models of care, suggesting these models may not meaningfully influence prescribing endpoints. Additional efforts are needed to understand the impact of team-based care among older adults and improve primary care prescribing practices.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsInappropriate PrescribingAgedHumansOntarioPrimary Health CareQuebecCanadaMedication managementOlder adultsPolypharmacyPrimary careTeam-based care

Identifiers

PMID36627566
PMCPMC9832790
OpenAlexW4315480002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.