Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36627499›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Changes in the number of cancer diagnosis practices due to the COVID-19 pandemic: interrupted time-series analysis using the National Database of Japan.

Misuzu Fujita, Kengo Nagashima, Kiminori Suzuki, Tokuzo Kasai, Hideyuki Hashimoto, Kazuya Yamaguchi, Yoshihiro Onouchi, Daisuke Sato, Takehiko Fujisawa, Akira Hata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Misuzu FujitaDepartment of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 32-14 Shin-Minato, Mihama-Ku, Chiba, 261-0002, Japan. mi-hujita@kenko-chiba.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-4744
Kengo NagashimaBiostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4529-9045
Kiminori SuzukiDepartment of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 32-14 Shin-Minato, Mihama-Ku, Chiba, 261-0002, Japan.
Tokuzo KasaiDepartment of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 32-14 Shin-Minato, Mihama-Ku, Chiba, 261-0002, Japan.
Hideyuki HashimotoDepartment of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 32-14 Shin-Minato, Mihama-Ku, Chiba, 261-0002, Japan.
Kazuya YamaguchiDepartment of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 32-14 Shin-Minato, Mihama-Ku, Chiba, 261-0002, Japan.
Yoshihiro OnouchiDepartment of Public Health, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-5913
Daisuke SatoCenter for Next Generation of Community Health, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Takehiko FujisawaDepartment of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 32-14 Shin-Minato, Mihama-Ku, Chiba, 261-0002, Japan.
Akira HataDepartment of Health Research, Chiba Foundation for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 32-14 Shin-Minato, Mihama-Ku, Chiba, 261-0002, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0867-3704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to reveal the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on the number of practices commonly used for cancer diagnosis in Japan.

methodsThe sampling dataset of the National Database of Japan from January 2015 to January 2021 was used to generate 25-point time-series data for the number of practices (21 points before and 4 points during the pandemic outbreak). The decreased number was estimated by interrupted time-series analysis using a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average model. Using the pre-pandemic data, expected counterfactual numbers during the pandemic were predicted, and decreased rate was calculated.

resultsIn most practices, the number dramatically decreased in the early stage of the pandemic and recovered rapidly thereafter. As of April 2020, gastric endoscopy decreased at the top of the practices (- 42.1%, with 95% confidence intervals of - 50.5% and - 33.7%), followed by gastric biopsy (- 38.6%, with 95% confidence intervals of - 46.7% and - 30.6%). The period of declined practices for lung cancer was relatively prolonged. The number of sentinel lymph node biopsies for breast cancer and colposcopies and biopsies for cervical cancer did not decrease in April 2020, but significantly decreased later in July 2020, which is assumed to be the time lapse after the primary testing before surgical treatment or intense scrutiny.

conclusionIn general, the number of practices for cancer diagnosis in Japan showed only a temporary decline, which was concordant with reports from several other countries.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingFemaleHumansJapanPandemicsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyCancer diagnosisCOVID-19Health servicesThe National Database of Japan

Identifiers

PMID36627499
PMCPMC9838522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.