Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36627473›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023

Age-related differences in frontoparietal activation for target and distractor singletons during visual search.

Jenna L Merenstein, Hollie A Mullin, David J Madden

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jenna L MerensteinBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3918, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. jenna.merenstein@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1631-1340
Hollie A MullinBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3918, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
David J MaddenBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3918, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Duke University · US

Funding

Neuroimaging of Visual Attention in AgingR01AG039684 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, DAVID J. · 2011 to 2022
$5.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related decline in visual search performance has been associated with different patterns of activation in frontoparietal regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), but whether these age-related effects represent specific influences of target and distractor processing is unclear. Therefore, we acquired event-related fMRI data from 68 healthy, community-dwelling adults ages 18-78 years, during both conjunction (T/F target among rotated Ts and Fs) and feature (T/F target among Os) search. Some displays contained a color singleton that could correspond to either the target or a distractor. A diffusion decision analysis indicated age-related increases in sensorimotor response time across all task conditions, but an age-related decrease in the rate of evidence accumulation (drift rate) was specific to conjunction search. Moreover, the color singleton facilitated search performance when occurring as a target and disrupted performance when occurring as a distractor, but only during conjunction search, and these effects were independent of age. The fMRI data indicated that decreased search efficiency for conjunction relative to feature search was evident as widespread frontoparietal activation. Activation within the left insula mediated the age-related decrease in drift rate for conjunction search, whereas this relation in the FEF and parietal cortex was significant only for individuals younger than 30 or 44 years, respectively. Finally, distractor singletons were associated with significant parietal activation, whereas target singletons were associated with significant frontoparietal deactivation, and this latter effect increased with adult age. Age-related differences in frontoparietal activation therefore reflect both the overall efficiency of search and the enhancement from salient targets.

Indexed as

AttentionVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedParietal LobeReaction TimeYoung AdultAttention and agingAttention: Neural mechanismsVisual search

Identifiers

PMID36627473
PMCPMC10066832
OpenAlexW4315433224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.