ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023
Development and validation of a simple-to-use nomogram for predicting minimal change disease based on quantification of color Doppler sonography data from a region of interest.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo establish a simple-to-use nomogram based on quantification of color Doppler sonography data from a region of interest (ROI) to diagnose minimal change disease (MCD) promptly and non-invasively, and to evaluate the prediction capability of the nomogram.
methodsWe recruited 564 patients with pathology-proven renal disease who were admitted to our hospital from July 2020 to July 2021 (388 patients in the training dataset and 176 patients in the validation dataset), and their color Doppler sonography data were acquired from a ROI and underwent ipsilateral renal biopsy. The collected clinical features and ultrasonic features were imported into Rstuido and statistically significant features were selected by stepwise regression using the forward-backward method. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was combined with clinical analysis to obtain the final modeling features. General and dynamic nomogram models were constructed with the selected features, depending on whether they were MCD or not. Bootstrapping and internal validation were used for internal and external validation of the nomogram, respectively. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by C-index, calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
resultsAge and VI were independent factors in predicting MCD. The value of Age (Best cut-off value: 33.5 years) combined with VI (Best cut-off value: 40.50 points) in the diagnosis of MCD was significantly higher than that of single diagnosis (AUC 0.901, 95% CI 0.863-0.938). The C-index of the nomogram constructed with age and VI in the training and validation datasets was 0.915 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.874-0.956 and 0.875 95% CI 0.783-0.967], respectively. Calibration curves were fitted well. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 76.1%, 95.6%, and 78.3%, respectively, in the training dataset, and 74.1%, 94.4%, and 76.1% in the validation dataset, respectively.
conclusionThe nomogram constructed with age and VI showed a satisfactory degree of differentiation and accuracy, which is of great significance for early, non-invasively, and individually analysis of the risk of MCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.