Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36627380›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ 10 cm): a comparative study of surgical management and follow-up treatment in a single institution.

Pongserath Sirichindakul, Sarat Sanguanlosit, Wipusit Taesombat, Methee Sutherasan, Athaya Vorasittha, Bunthoon Nonthasoot

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pongserath SirichindakulDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, 1873, Rama 4 Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. pongserath.s@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-8829
Sarat SanguanlositDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, 63 Rangsit - Nakhon Nayok Rd, Ongkharak District, Ongkharak, 26120, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand.
Wipusit TaesombatDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, 1873, Rama 4 Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Methee SutherasanDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, 1873, Rama 4 Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Athaya VorasitthaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, 1873, Rama 4 Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Bunthoon NonthasootDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, 1873, Rama 4 Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Chulalongkorn University · THSrinakharinwirot University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLiver resection (LR) of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increasingly been regarded as a viable option of enhanced efficacy for patients, but most studies have focused on comparing various tumor sizes and the outcomes of surgery. The study aim was to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of huge HCC with and without cirrhosis that underwent LR, and to delineate the treatment for recurrence.

methodsSixty-three patients with huge HCC who underwent hepatectomy from 2010 to 2019 were enrolled and reviewed. Clinicopathological findings, surgical outcomes of the entire cohort, and differences between the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups were analyzed.

resultsForty patients (60.3%) had huge HCC with cirrhosis. Clinicopathological findings were not different between the two groups, except tumor size ≥ 15 cm (40% in cirrhosis vs 17.4% in non-cirrhosis, p = 0.024) and major portal vein tumor thrombus were detected only in the cirrhosis group (11 patients, p = 0.006). Extended LR was performed in 13 cirrhotic patients (32.5%) and in 1 non-cirrhotic patient (4.4%) (p = 0.010). Operative data, postoperative complications including postoperative liver failure, and pattern of recurrence were not different between the two groups. For the entire cohort, mortality rate was 1.5%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were 81%, 54%, and 39%. Multivariate analysis showed resection margin ≥ 0.1 cm was a good prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.247 (p = 0.017)). For tumor recurrence, local ablative treatment for liver recurrence and resection for lung recurrence provided good long-term outcomes.

conclusionAlthough huge HCC with cirrhosis has been a more unfavorable tumor, LR still provided long-term survival with acceptable risk morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansLiver CirrhosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCirrhosisHuge hepatocellular carcinomaLiver cancerLiver resectionRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36627380
OpenAlexW4315488052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.