ArticleScientific reports2023
Learning the dynamics of realistic models of C. elegans nervous system with recurrent neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Controllability ofBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Method development for correlating lipid molecular information with anatomy in C. elegans.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- On collective behavior inFrontiers in neurorobotics · 2025Review
- The Roles of Potassium and Calcium Currents in the Bistable Firing Transition.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- The Role of Potassium and Calcium Currents in the Bistable Firing Transition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the inherent complexity of the human nervous system, insight into the dynamics of brain activity can be gained from studying smaller and simpler organisms. While some of the potential target organisms are simple enough that their behavioural and structural biology might be well-known and understood, others might still lead to computationally intractable models that require extensive resources to simulate. Since such organisms are frequently only acting as proxies to further our understanding of underlying phenomena or functionality, often one is not interested in the detailed evolution of every single neuron in the system. Instead, it is sufficient to observe the subset of neurons that capture the effect that the profound nonlinearities of the neuronal system have in response to different stimuli. In this paper, we consider the well-known nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and seek to investigate the possibility of generating lower complexity models that capture the system's dynamics with low error using only measured or simulated input-output information. Such models are often termed black-box models. We show how the nervous system of C. elegans can be modelled and simulated with data-driven models using different neural network architectures. Specifically, we target the use of state-of-the-art recurrent neural network architectures such as Long Short-Term Memory and Gated Recurrent Units and compare these architectures in terms of their properties and their accuracy (Root Mean Square Error), as well as the complexity of the resulting models. We show that Gated Recurrent Unit models with a hidden layer size of 4 are able to accurately reproduce the system response to very different stimuli. We furthermore explore the relative importance of their inputs as well as scalability to more scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.