Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36626950›Full record

SynthesisAnaerobe2023

Nonmammalian models to study Clostridioides difficile infection; a systematic review.

Chenlin Hu, Kevin W Garey

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anaerobe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The state of play of rodent models for the study ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chenlin HuUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
Kevin W GareyUniversity of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, TX, 77204, USA. Electronic address: kgarey@uh.edu.

Funding

Project 3: Functional Microbiome and Host Signatures in Transition from Commensal to pathogenP01AI152999 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SAVIDGE, TOR C. · 2020 to 2025
$12.0M
VENOUS: A translational study of enterococcal bacteremiaR01AI148342 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ARIAS, CESAR AUGUSTO · 2020 to 2024
$3.9M
POR Program on Genomic Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance in VREK24AI121296 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ARIAS, CESAR AUGUSTO · 2016 to 2025
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI121296NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI152999NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridioide difficile is the leading cause of diarrhea disease worldwide and is a CDC-designated urgent threat level pathogen. Mammalian models are commonly utilized as gold standard to study the pathogenesis of C. difficile infection (CDI); however, alternatives are needed due to cost, higher throughput ability, and mammalian animal ethics. Nonmammalian models such as great wax worm, nematode, fruit fly, and zebrafish have been used as CDI models. This review provides a comprehensive summary of nonmammalian models used to study CDI. Multiple studies were identified using these models to study C. difficile infection, pathogenicity, colonization, host immunity, and therapy. Translational outcomes and strength and weakness of each nonmammalian model are discussed.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsAnimalsMammalsZebrafishClostridioides difficileFruit flyGreat wax wormInfectionModelNematodeZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID36626950
PMCPMC9975065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.