Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36626912›Full record

ArticleLaryngo- rhino- otologie2023

[Webinars for ENT specialists in Germany during the Lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic 2020/2021].

Leif Erik Walther, Jan Löhler

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngo- rhino- otologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leif Erik WaltherHNO-Gemeinschaftspraxis Main-Taunus-Zentrum, Sulzbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2959-4995
Jan LöhlerHNO, Praxis, Bad Bramstedt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9865-5731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, webinars are one of the few opportunities to continue CME training to a large majority of ENT doctors. However, experiences with the quality of this digital form of education is still limited. METHODOLOGY: In this study, six webinars for ENT specialists during the second lockdown in Germany (January to March 2021, provider Zoom) were evaluated. The quality control was performed by participants and speakers using special quality questions. School grades (1-6) were used for the evaluation. Answers were statistically evaluated.

resultsOn average, 1108 participants attended the six webinars. 330 ENT doctors answered the surveys. The return of the questionnaires was 30.2%, that of the speakers 100%. Eight of the nine questions asked received school grades better than 2.0 on average. The speakers needed an average of 12.8 hours to prepare the webinar. The cost per webinar was about 3.50 €.

conclusionsWebinars have become an effective form of CME-training for ENT doctors in Germany. They can be organized quickly for a large number of participants, are less expensive and environmentally benefical. Webinars might have an important place in CME-training in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlGermanyHumansPandemicsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36626912
PMCPMC10315213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.