ArticleNano letters2023
Classical Quantum Friction at Water-Carbon Interfaces.
Article in Nano letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A unified machine-learning framework for ab initio multiscale modeling of liquids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Article
- Quantum-Scale Friction at Solid-Liquid Interface: Simulation, Detection Techniques, Mechanisms, and Emerging Applications.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Understanding water behaviour on 2D material interfaces through single-molecule motion on h-BN and graphene.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Momentum tunnelling between nanoscale liquid flows.Nature nanotechnology · 2025Article
- Hydroelectric energy conversion of waste flows through hydroelectronic drag.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Fluorescence changes in carbon nanotube sensors correlate with THz absorption of hydration.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Anomalous friction of supercooled glycerol on mica.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Impedance of nanocapacitors from molecular simulations to understand the dynamics of confined electrolytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Collective modes and quantum effects in two-dimensional nanofluidic channels.Faraday discussions · 2024Article
- (Nano)Granules-Involving Aggregation at a Passage to the Nanoscale as Viewed in Terms of a Diffusive Heisenberg Relation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Electron cooling in graphene enhanced by plasmon-hydron resonance.Nature nanotechnology · 2023Article
- Intrinsic Interface Adsorption Drives Selectivity in Atomically Smooth Nanofluidic Channels.Nano letters · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Friction at water-carbon interfaces remains a major puzzle with theories and simulations unable to explain experimental trends in nanoscale waterflow. A recent theoretical framework─quantum friction (QF)─proposes to resolve these experimental observations by considering nonadiabatic coupling between dielectric fluctuations in water and graphitic surfaces. Here, using a classical model that enables fine-tuning of the solid's dielectric spectrum, we provide evidence from simulations in general support of QF. In particular, as features in the solid's dielectric spectrum begin to overlap with water's librational and Debye modes, we find an increase in friction in line with that proposed by QF. At the microscopic level, we find that this contribution to friction manifests more distinctly in the dynamics of the solid's charge density than that of water. Our findings suggest that experimental signatures of QF may be more pronounced in the solid's response rather than liquid water's.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.