Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36626764›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2023

Critical Assessment of Methods for Predicting the 3D Structure of Proteins and Protein Complexes.

Shoshana J Wodak, Sandor Vajda, Marc F Lensink, Dima Kozakov, Paul A Bates

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Machine-Learned Representations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. GRAMMCell: Docking-based Cell Modeling Resource.Journal of molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shoshana J WodakVIB-VUB Center for Structural Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; email: Shoshana.wodak@gmail.com.
Sandor VajdaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; email: vajda@bu.edu.
Marc F LensinkUniv. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8576-UGSF-Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Lille, France; email: marc.lensink@univ-lille.fr.
Dima KozakovDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA; email: midas@laufercenter.org.
Paul A BatesBiomolecular Modelling Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom; email: paul.bates@crick.ac.uk.

Funding

Analysis and Prediction of Molecular InteractionsR35GM118078 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SANDOR VAJDA · 2016 to 2026
$6.5M
Simulation of Multi-Protein systemsR01GM140098 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KOZAKOV, DMYTRO · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Cancer Research UK FC001003Medical Research Council FC001003NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140098NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118078Wellcome Trust FC001003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in a scientific discipline are often measured by small, incremental steps. In this review, we report on two intertwined disciplines in the protein structure prediction field, modeling of single chains and modeling of complexes, that have over decades emulated this pattern, as monitored by the community-wide blind prediction experiments CASP and CAPRI. However, over the past few years, dramatic advances were observed for the accurate prediction of single protein chains, driven by a surge of deep learning methodologies entering the prediction field. We review the mainscientific developments that enabled these recent breakthroughs and feature the important role of blind prediction experiments in building up and nurturing the structure prediction field. We discuss how the new wave of artificial intelligence-based methods is impacting the fields of computational and experimental structural biology and highlight areas in which deep learning methods are likely to lead to future developments, provided that major challenges are overcome.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceProtein Conformationartificial intelligenceCAPRICASPcritical assessment of predicted interactionscritical assessment of structure predictionsprotein interactionsprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID36626764
PMCPMC10885158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.