ReviewJournal of proteome research2023
Proteomics Standards Initiative at Twenty Years: Current Activities and Future Work.
Review in Journal of proteome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and in silico analysis of studies investigating the ischemic penumbra proteome in animal models of experimental stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024Pooled it
- Mapping ovarian cellular and molecular landscape across the lifespan of women: a scoping review.Human reproduction update · 2026Article
- Agentic AI-Assisted Coding Offers a Unique Opportunity to Instill Epistemic Grounding during Software Development.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Article
- The need for standardization and improved open (meta)data practices in metaproteomics.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Consensus statement on mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of cardiac tissue.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Article
- FAIR4prep: FAIR clinical informatics data preprocessing in artificial intelligence applications.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Review
- Semantic annotation of Glycomics and Glycoproteomics methods.Glycobiology · 2026Article
- Unlocking the Next Decade of Proteomics with Standardized, Structured Metadata.Journal of proteome research · 2026Review
- The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2026: making proteomics data FAIR.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Machine learning and multi-omics technologies for precision cardiovascular medicine: advancing diagnosis, risk prediction, and therapeutic guidance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Interactomics: Dissecting Protein Networks in Living Systems.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Challenges and Opportunities for Statistics in Omics Data Analysis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Proteomics Approaches to Ecoimmunology: New Insights into Wildlife Immunity and Disease.Integrative and comparative biology · 2025Review
- mzPeak: Designing a Scalable, Interoperable, and Future-Ready Mass Spectrometry Data Format.Journal of proteome research · 2025Review
- The $10 proteome: low-cost, deep and quantitative proteome profiling of limited sample amounts using the Orbitrap Astral and timsTOF Ultra 2 mass spectrometers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The microbiologist's guide to metaproteomics.iMeta · 2025Review
- What Have Data Standards Ever Done for Us?Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025Review
- Open-Source and FAIR Research Software for Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) has been successfully developing guidelines, data formats, and controlled vocabularies (CVs) for the proteomics community and other fields supported by mass spectrometry since its inception 20 years ago. Here we describe the general operation of the PSI, including its leadership, working groups, yearly workshops, and the document process by which proposals are thoroughly and publicly reviewed in order to be ratified as PSI standards. We briefly describe the current state of the many existing PSI standards, some of which remain the same as when originally developed, some of which have undergone subsequent revisions, and some of which have become obsolete. Then the set of proposals currently being developed are described, with an open call to the community for participation in the forging of the next generation of standards. Finally, we describe some synergies and collaborations with other organizations and look to the future in how the PSI will continue to promote the open sharing of data and thus accelerate the progress of the field of proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.