Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36626696›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Performance of Technologist-Performed Screening Breast Ultrasound After Tomosynthesis in Women With Dense Breasts (the DBTUST).

Wendie A Berg, Margarita L Zuley, Thomas S Chang, Terri-Ann Gizienski, Denise M Chough, Marcela Böhm-Vélez, Danielle E Sharek, Michelle R Straka, Christiane M Hakim, Jamie Y Hartman and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wendie A BergDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-6185
Margarita L ZuleyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2127-8346
Thomas S ChangWeinstein Imaging Associates, Pittsburgh, PA.
Terri-Ann GizienskiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Denise M ChoughDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Marcela Böhm-VélezWeinstein Imaging Associates, Pittsburgh, PA.
Danielle E SharekWeinstein Imaging Associates, Pittsburgh, PA.
Michelle R StrakaWeinstein Imaging Associates, Pittsburgh, PA.
Christiane M HakimDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jamie Y HartmanDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kimberly S HarnistDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Cathy S TymaDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Amy E KellyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Uzma WaheedDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-8208-9456
Golbahar HoushmandDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Bronwyn E NairDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Dilip D ShindeDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Amy H LuDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Andriy I BandosDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jeremy M BergDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Nicole B LettiereDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Marie A GanottDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Pittsburgh · USAmgen (United States) · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Assessment of periodic screening of women with denser breast using WBUS and DBTR01CA187593 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BERG, WENDIE A · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA187593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone or combined with technologist-performed handheld screening ultrasound (US) in women with dense breasts.

methodsIn an institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant multicenter protocol in western Pennsylvania, 6,179 women consented to three rounds of annual screening, interpreted by two radiologist observers, and had appropriate follow-up. Primary analysis was based on first observer results.

resultsMean participant age was 54.8 years (range, 40-75 years). Across 17,552 screens, there were 126 cancer events in 125 women (7.2/1,000; 95% CI, 5.9 to 8.4). In year 1, DBT-alone cancer yield was 5.0/1,000, and of DBT+US, 6.3/1,000, difference 1.3/1,000 (95% CI, 0.3 to 2.1;

conclusionOverall added cancer detection rate of US screening after DBT was modest at 19/17,552 (1.1/1,000; CI, 0.5- to 1.6) screens but potentially overcomes substantial increases in false-positive recalls and benign biopsies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyAdultAgedBreast DensityEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36626696
PMCPMC10150890
OpenAlexW4315433995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.