Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36626648›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Public Use of the "Your COVID Recovery" Website Designed to Help Individuals Manage Their COVID-19 Recovery: Observational Study.

Molly M Baldwin, Enya Daynes, Emma Chaplin, Amye Goddard, Phoebe H I Lloyd-Evans, George Mills, Annabel Hong, Nikki Gardiner, Sally J Singh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Molly M BaldwinCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6269-7961
Enya DaynesCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0127-1649
Emma ChaplinCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-2980
Amye GoddardCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-0661
Phoebe H I Lloyd-EvansCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-0616
George MillsCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-6753
Annabel HongCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3529-1851
Nikki GardinerCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-3645
Sally J SinghCentre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-0366
Glenfield Hospital · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, unprecedented pressure was placed on health care services globally. An opportunity to alleviate this pressure was to introduce a digital health platform that provided COVID-19-related advice and helped individuals understand and manage their COVID-19 symptoms. Therefore, in July 2020, the Your COVID Recovery website was launched by the National Health Service of England with the aim of creating a practical tool that provides advice and support to individuals recovering from COVID-19. The website includes information on many of the key COVID-19 symptoms. To date, public use of the Your COVID Recovery website and user behavior remain unknown. However, this information is likely to afford insight into the impact of the website and most commonly experienced COVID-19 symptoms.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate public use of the Your COVID Recovery website, a digital health platform that provides support to individuals recovering from COVID-19, and determine user behavior during its first year of operation.

methodsGoogle Analytics software that was integrated into the Your COVID Recovery website was used to assess website use and user behavior between July 31, 2020, and July 31, 2021. Variables that were tracked included the number of users, user country of residence, traffic source, number of page views, number of session views, and mean session duration. User data were compared to COVID-19 case data downloaded from the UK government's website.

resultsDuring the study period, 2,062,394 users accessed the Your COVID Recovery website. The majority of users were located in the United Kingdom (1,265,061/2,062,394, 61.30%) and accessed the website via a search engine (1,443,057/2,062,394, 69.97%). The number of daily website users (n=15,298) peaked on January 18, 2021, during the second wave of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. The most frequently visited pages after the home page were for the following COVID-19 symptoms: Cough (n=550,190, 12.17%), Fatigue (n=432,421, 9.56%), Musculoskeletal pain (n=406,859, 9.00%), Taste and smell (n=270,599, 5.98%), and Breathlessness (n=203,136, 4.49%). The average session duration was 1 minute 13 seconds.

conclusionsA large cohort of individuals actively sought help with their COVID-19 recovery from the website, championing the potential of this tool to target an unmet health care need. User behavior demonstrated that individuals were primarily seeking advice on how to relieve and manage COVID-19 symptoms, especially symptoms of cough, fatigue, and musculoskeletal pain. COVID-19 rehabilitation programs should use the results of this study to ensure that the program content meets the needs of the post-COVID-19 population.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19digital healthcaredigital health toolGoogle Analyticshealthcare platformpandemicsymptom managementuser behaviorwebsite analysis

Identifiers

PMID36626648
PMCPMC9872975
OpenAlexW4292615551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.