ArticleMedicine2022
Robot-assisted anterior transpedicular screw fixation with 3D printed implant for multiple cervical fractures: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical evaluation of four internal fixation systems for two-segment anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Accuracy of robot-assisted anterior transpedicular screws in the subaxial cervical spine: an experimental study on human specimens.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Article
- Biomechanical study of anterior transpedicular root screw intervertebral fusion system of lower cervical spine: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleThe anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixation in the cervical spine provides the advantages of both anterior and posterior cervical surgery; however, it poses a high risk of screw insertion. In addition, a 3D printed implant can match ATPS fixation and reconstruction of the vertebral body. Robot-assisted surgery can make this process easier and potentially improve the safety and accuracy of the procedure. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 64-year-old female was hit by a heavy object 4 days before presentation to our hospital. The patient exhibited a muscle strength of 0/5 in both the lower limbs and 3/5 in both the upper limbs. The visual analogue scale (VAS) for the neck was 5 points. Computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine identified a burst fracture of the C5 vertebral body, and longitudinal splitting fracture of the C6 and C7 vertebral bodies accompanied with a split in the lamina. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a spinal cord edema from the C3 to the C7 level. DIAGNOSIS: Multiple cervical fractures with spinal cord injury.
interventionsAnterior C4-5 and C5-6 disc resection, C5 corpectomy, robot-assisted ATPS fixation with the 3-D printed implant was performed. OUTCOMES: The CT scans revealed a satisfactory location of the internal implantation without any signs of complications associated with implantations. Six months later, the muscle strength of both the upper limbs increased from level 3 to level 5, VAS of neck decreased from 5 to 0. LESSONS: Robot-assisted ATPS internal fixation combined with custom implantation surgery using a 3D printed vertebral body provides an important solution to solve special cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.