ArticleMedicine2022
The comprehensive comparison of imaging sign from CT angiography and noncontrast CT for predicting intracranial hemorrhage expansion: A comparative study.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Deep Learning for Predicting Hematoma Expansion in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Computed Tomography Scans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.La Radiologia medica · 2025Pooled it
- Temporal Profile of Soluble TLR4 and its Association with Intracerebral Haemorrhage Expansion.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Pre-Hospital Rate-Pressure Product Is Not Positively Associated with Hematoma Expansion or Initial Hematoma Volume in Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage.Neurology international · 2026Article
- The role of imaging in predicting 3-month prognosis of primary intracerebral hemorrhage: a single-center, prospective observational study in tertiary care hospital.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expansion of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is an important predictor of poor clinical outcomes. Various imaging markers on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) or computed tomographic angiography (CTA) have been reported as predictors of ICH expansion. We aimed to compare the associations between various CT imaging markers and ICH expansion. Patients with spontaneous ICH who underwent initial NCCT, CTA, and subsequent NCCT between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively identified. ICH expansion was defined as a volume increase of > 33% or > 6 mL. We analyzed the presence of imaging markers such as the black hole sign, blend sign, island sign, or swirl sign on initial NCCT or spot sign on CTA. An alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed using a 4-point scoring system based on the consensus of the reviewers. The predictive value of each marker was assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A total of 250 patients, including 60 (24.0%) with ICH expansion, qualified for the analysis. Among the patients with spontaneous ICH, 118 (47.2%) presented with a black hole sign, 52 (20.8%) with a blend sign, 93 (37.2%) with an island sign, 79 (31.6%) with a swirl sign, and 56 (22.4%) with a spot sign. In univariate logistic regression, the initial ICH volume (P = .038), initial intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) presence (P < .001), swirl sign (P < .001), and spot sign (P < .001) were associated with ICH expansion. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the presence of initial IVH (odds ratio, 4.111; P = .002) and spot sign (odds ratio, 109.5; P < .001) were independent predictors of ICH expansion. Initial ICH volume, IVH, swirl sign, and spot sign are associated with ICH expansion. The presence of spot signs and IVH were independent predictors of ICH expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.