Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36626406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

On the effectiveness of random walks for modeling epidemics on networks.

Sooyeong Kim, Jane Breen, Ekaterina Dudkina, Federico Poloni, Emanuele Crisostomi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sooyeong KimDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0281-7984
Jane BreenFaculty of Science, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6048-9368
Ekaterina DudkinaDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Federico PoloniDepartment of Computer Science, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2291-990X
Emanuele CrisostomiDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Constructions Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7973-6357
University of Pisa · ITOntario Tech University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random walks on graphs are often used to analyse and predict epidemic spreads and to investigate possible control actions to mitigate them. In this study, we first show that models based on random walks with a single stochastic agent (such as Google's popular PageRank) may provide a poor description of certain features of epidemic spread: most notably, spreading times. Then, we discuss another Markov chain based method that does reflect the correct mean infection times for the disease to spread between individuals in a network, and we determine a procedure that allows one to compute them efficiently via a sampling strategy. Finally, we present a novel centrality measure based on infection times, and we compare its node ranking properties with other centrality measures based on random walks. Our results are provided for a simple SI model for epidemic spreading.

Indexed as

EpidemicsHumansMarkov Chains

Identifiers

PMID36626406
PMCPMC9831309
OpenAlexW4315435069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.