ArticleJAMA network open2023
Estimated Indirect Cost Savings of Using Telehealth Among Nonelderly Patients With Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Multimodal Telerehabilitation on Reducing Disparities in Rural Survivors of Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Multimodal Telerehabilitation of Rural Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer
Multimodal Telerehabilitation in Patients Undergoing CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy
Who cites it
98 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From economic burden to patient-centered solutions: the evolving landscape of financial toxicity in oncology.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of responders and nonresponders with knee osteoarthritis after transcranial direct current stimulation.Pain management · 2024Trial
- Experiences and coping strategies of time toxicity in young and middle-aged patients with lymphoma: a descriptive qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Tele-Oncology in the Post-Pandemic Era: Clinical Integration, Access Disparities and Medico-Legal Accountability.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Exploring the barriers to optimal survivorship care for people living with Cancer in NSW.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic Impact, Equity, and Sustainability in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: A Structured Narrative Review.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Telehealth service use in people with cancer compared to people without cancer: analysis of Patient Experience Surveys in Australia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Identifying Barriers to Being Offered and Accepting a Telehealth Visit for Cancer Care: Unpacking the Multi-Levels of Documented Racial Disparities in Telehealth Use.Health services research · 2026Article
- Health care cost trajectories among patients with cancer and cardiometabolic comorbidities over a decade including the pandemic period.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Telemedicine Adoption for Managing Chronic and Rare Diseases in Indonesia During and Beyond the COVID-19 Era: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Understanding financial toxicity in cancer care through a social-ecological lens.Current opinion in oncology · 2026Review
- Real World Outcomes of a Condensed Classroom-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Predicting Anticipated Telehealth Use: Development of the CONTEST Score and Machine Learning Models Using a National U.S. Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Episode Charges and Subsequent Visits After Telemedicine vs In-Person Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Test Ordering and Completion During Virtual vs In-Person Annual Visits.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Financial Toxicity of Hematologic Malignancy Therapies, Including Cellular Therapy and Its Impact on Access to Care: Prospective Pilot Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Observational
- Review
- Building Patient Capabilities for Using Virtual Care: A Document Analysis of Patient Support Resources and Guidance.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Trends in Telemedicine at a Cancer Center: Analyzing Sustained Use.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Connecting care-telemedicine breaks barriers for low-income Brazilians battling breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026Article
38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with cancer typically have greater financial hardships and time costs than individuals without cancer. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated this, while posing substantial challenges to delivering cancer care and resulting in important changes in care-delivery models, including the rapid adoption of telehealth. Objective: To estimate patient travel, time, and cost savings associated with telehealth for cancer care delivery. Design, Setting, and Participants: An economic evaluation of cost savings from completed telehealth visits from April 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021, in a single-institution National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. All patients aged 18 to 65 years who completed telehealth visits within the designated time frame and had a Florida mailing address documented in their electronic medical record were included in the study cohort. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to June 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was estimated patient cost savings from telehealth, which included 2 components: costs of travel (defined as roundtrip distance saved from car travel) and potential loss of productivity due to the medical visit (defined as loss of income from roundtrip travel plus loss of income from in-person clinic visits). Two different models with a combination of 2 different mileage rates ($0.56 and $0.82 per mile) and census tract-level median hourly wages were used. Results: The study included 25 496 telehealth visits with 11 688 patients. There were 4525 (3795 patients) new or established visits and 20 971 (10 049 patients) follow-up visits. Median (IQR) age was 55.0 (46.0-61.0) years among the telehealth visits, with 15 663 visits (61.4%) by women and 18 360 visits (72.0%) by Hispanic non-White patients. According to cost models, the estimated mean (SD) total cost savings ranged from $147.4 ($120.1) at $0.56/mile to $186.1 ($156.9) at $0.82/mile. For new or established visits, the mean (SD) total cost savings per visit ranged from $176.6 ($136.3) at $0.56/mile to $222.8 ($177.4) at $0.82/mile, and for follow-up visits, the mean (SD) total cost savings per visit was $141.1 ($115.3) at $0.56/mile to $178.1 ($150.9) at $0.82/mile. Conclusions and Relevance: In this economic evaluation, telehealth was associated with savings in patients time and travel costs, which may reduce the financial toxicity of cancer care. Expansion of telehealth oncology services may be an effective strategy to reduce the financial burden among patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.