Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Diane K NewmanDivision of Urology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5083-6397
Jerry L LowderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1065-4537
Melanie MeisterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Lisa K LowSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan, USA.
Colleen M FitzgeraldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Cynthia S FokDepartment of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Julia Geynisman-TanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9225-6067
Emily S LukaczDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UC San Diego School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Alayne MarklandDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics and Palliative Care, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6567-6744
Sara PutnamDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Kyle RudserDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Ariana L SmithDivision of Urology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9784-2559
Janis M MillerSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan, USA.
Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USLoyola University Chicago · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Kansas · USWashington University in St. Louis · US
Funding
Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium Scientific and Data Coordinating CenterU24DK106786 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MCGWIN, GERALD, RUDSER, KYLE · 2020 to 2024
$7.1M
University of Pennsylvania+ PLUS Clinical Center (PENN+PLUS CC)U01DK106892 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI NEWMAN, DIANE K., SMITH, ARIANA L · 2015 to 2024
$5.4M
PLUS Loyola Clinical CenterU01DK106898 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA, FITZGERALD, COLLEEN MARIE · 2015 to 2024
$4.7M
Prevention of LUTS: Bladder Health Clinical Center, UC San Diego SiteU01DK106827 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LACOURSIERE, DAPHNE YVETTE, LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2015 to 2024
$4.5M
Pathways to LUTS Prevention: A Model for Public Education, Behavioral Skills, and Early DetectionU01DK106858 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MCGWIN, GERALD · 2015 to 2024
$4.5M
LUTS PREVENTION IN ADOLESCENT GIRLS AND WOMEN ACROSS THE LIFESPANU01DK106853 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SUTCLIFFE, SIOBHAN · 2015 to 2024
$4.0M
The Truly Healthy Bladder: Understanding Normal As A Pathway To Prevention Of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms In WomenU01DK106893 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOW, LISA KANE · 2015 to 2024
$3.8M
Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium Yale Clinical Research CenterU01DK106908 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RICKEY, LESLIE M. · 2015 to 2024
$3.5M
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PLUS CLINICAL SITEU01DK126045 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GRIFFITH, JAMES WILLIAM, SIMON, MELISSA A. · 2020 to 2024
objectiveThe Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) research consortium launched the RISE FOR HEALTH (RISE) national study of women's bladder health which includes annual surveys and an in-person visit. For the in-person exam, a standardized, replicable approach to conducting a pelvic muscle (PM) assessment was necessary. The process used to develop the training, the products, and group testing results from the education and training are described.
methodsA comprehensive pelvic muscle assessment (CPMA) program was informed by literature view and expert opinion. Training materials were prepared for use on an electronicLearning (e-Learning) platform. An in-person hands-on simulation and certification session was then designed. It included a performance checklist assessment for use by Clinical Trainers, who in collaboration with a gynecology teaching assistant, provided an audit and feedback process to determine Trainee competency.
resultsFive discrete components for CPMA training were developed as e-Learning modules. These were: (1) overview of all the clinical measures and PM anatomy and examination assessments, (2) visual assessment for pronounced pelvic organ prolapse, (3) palpatory assessment of the pubovisceral muscle to estimate muscle integrity, (4) digital vaginal assessment to estimate strength, duration, symmetry during PM contraction, and (5) pressure palpation of both myofascial structures and PMs to assess for self-report of pain. Seventeen Trainees completed the full CPMA training, all successfully meeting the a priori certification required pass rate of 85% on checklist assessment.
conclusionsThe RISE CPMA training program was successfully conducted to assure standardization of the PM assessment across the PLUS multicenter research sites. This approach can be used by researchers and healthcare professionals who desire a standardized approach to assess competency when performing this CPMA in the clinical or research setting.
Indexed as
Computer-Assisted InstructionPelvic Organ ProlapseUrinary Bladder DiseasesExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMuscle ContractionMusclescomprehensive pelvic muscle assessmentpelvic examinationpelvic floor myofascial painpelvic muscle strengthpelvic organ prolapsepubovisceral (pubococcygeus) musclewomen's health
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Comprehensive pelvic muscle assessment: Developing and testing a dual e-Learning and simulation-based training program. · full record | OpenQuestion