ArticleJournal of medical systems2023
Development and Validation of Conversational Agent to Pregnancy Safe-education.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Roles, Users, Benefits, and Limitations of Chatbots in Health Care: Rapid Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Role of Chatbots on Supporting Women in Perinatal Period: A Scoping Review.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pregnant women constantly need some information to support nutritional decisions during pregnancy, and many do not receive such assistance at all. This study aims to present a conversational agent to provide reliable information to pregnant women, focusing on nutritional education and evaluating the perception of pregnant women and health professionals about the agent. As a scientific contribution, this article developed and implemented a conversational agent in a real environment capable of generating reliable responses on the basis of a set of health documents. We proposed an intervention study with 25 women and 10 healthcare providers through a survey to measure the perceptions of these groups towards conversational agents. The results show that the intended design could ensure positive support for pregnant women, clarify certain issues for the public, and remove some knowledge barriers. The results showed no significant difference between the groups (p-value = 0.713). Depending on the perception of the pregnant group, the conversational agent model can teach new knowledge during the prenatal period (Mean = 4.56). The model presented for health professionals could already be indicated as a support tool for pregnant women (Mean = 4.7).
Indexed as
Identifiers
36626106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.