Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36625933›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2023

CARPEDIEM® for continuous kidney replacement therapy in neonates and small infants: a French multicenter retrospective study.

Jennifer Battista, Daniele De Luca, Sergio Eleni Dit Trolli, Lise Allard, Justine Bacchetta, Nourredine Bouhamri, Carole Enoch, Camille Faudeux, Julie Guichoux, Etienne Javouhey and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Continuous kidney replacement therapy with CARPEDIEMPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer BattistaDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Archet 2, CHU de Nice, Hôpital Archet, 151 Route Saint-Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France.
Daniele De LucaDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A. Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, and the Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France.
Sergio Eleni Dit TrolliDepartment of Intensive Care and Neonatal Medecine, CHU de Nice, Hôpital Archet, Nice, France.
Lise AllardPediatric Nephrology Unit, Reference Center for Rare Renal Diseases, SORARE, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Justine BacchettaReference Center for Rare Renal Diseases, Pediatric Nephrology-Rheumatology-Dermatology Unit and INSERM 1033 Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Femme Mere Enfant Hospital, Lyon 1 University, Bron, France.
Nourredine BouhamriPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
Carole EnochPediatric Nephrology, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Southwest Renal Rare Diseases Centre (SORARE), University Children's Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Camille FaudeuxDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Archet 2, CHU de Nice, Hôpital Archet, 151 Route Saint-Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France.
Julie GuichouxPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Etienne JavouheyPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Mother and Children University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Karine KolevPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Mother and Children University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.
Giulia RegiroliDivision of Pediatrics and Neonatal Critical Care, "A. Béclère" Medical Centre, Paris Saclay University Hospitals, APHP, and the Physiopathology and Therapeutic Innovation Unit-INSERM U999, Paris Saclay University, Paris, France.
Bruno RanchinReference Center for Rare Renal Diseases, Pediatric Nephrology-Rheumatology-Dermatology Unit and INSERM 1033 Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Femme Mere Enfant Hospital, Lyon 1 University, Bron, France.
Julie BernardorDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Archet 2, CHU de Nice, Hôpital Archet, 151 Route Saint-Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France. bernardor.j@chu-nice.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1356-1507
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRHôpital Femme Mère Enfant · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Côte d'Azur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine (CA.R.P.E.D.I.E.M.®) device is a continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) equipment dedicated to neonates and small infants. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, feasibility, outcomes, and technical considerations relating to CARPEDIEM® use.

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 19 newborns and six infants receiving CARPEDIEM® in five French pediatric and neonatal intensive care units. Laboratory parameters were collected at the initiation and end of the first CARPEDIEM® session. Results are presented as median [IQR] (range).

resultsAt initiation, age was 4 days [2-13] (1-1134) with a body weight of 3.3 kg [2.5-4] (1.3-11.1). Overall, 131 sessions and 2125 h of treatment were performed. Treatment duration per patient was 42 h [24-91] (8-557). Continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) was performed in 20 children. Blood flow rate was 8 mL/kg/min [6-9] (3-16). The effluent flow rate for CVVH was 74 mL/kg/h [43-99] (28-125) and net ultrafiltration (UF) 6 mL/kg/h [2-8] (1-12). In the five children treated by hemodialysis, the blood and dialysate flow rates were 6 mL/kg/min [5-7] (4-7) and 600 mL/h [300-600] (120-600), respectively, while session duration was 8 h [6-12] (2-24). Most infants required a catheter between 4.5 and 6.5 French. Hemodynamic instability with a need for volume replacement occurred in 31 sessions (23%). Thrombocytopenia was observed in 29 sessions (22%). No hemorrhage occurred; all the patients survived the sessions, but only eight patients (32%) were alive at hospital discharge.

conclusionsThese data confirm that the use of CARPEDIEM® is safe and effective in critically ill neonates and infants. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryContinuous Renal Replacement TherapyHemofiltrationChildHumansInfantInfant, NewbornRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesUltrafiltrationCARPEDIEM®Continuous kidney replacement therapyNeonate

Identifiers

PMID36625933
OpenAlexW4315435995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.