Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36625930›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Assessment of cataract surgery outcomes in Nampula (Mozambique): visual acuity, visual function and quality of life.

Dulnério Barbosa Sengo, Pires João Saravila, Sancho Sanuel Chivinde, Laura Mavota Mate, Momade Fumo Faquihe, Raul Moragues, Inmaculada López-Izquierdo, Pablo Caballero

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dulnério Barbosa SengoFaculdade Ciências de Saúde, Universidade Lúrio, Bairro de Marrere, R. Nr. 4250, Km 2,3, Nampula, Mozambique.
Pires João SaravilaFaculdade Ciências de Saúde, Universidade Lúrio, Bairro de Marrere, R. Nr. 4250, Km 2,3, Nampula, Mozambique.
Sancho Sanuel ChivindeHospital Central de Nampula, Av Samora Machel, Bairro Central, Nampula, Mozambique.
Laura Mavota MateMinistério Dos Combatentes, Av Mártires Machava 307, Maputo, Mozambique.
Momade Fumo FaquiheFaculdade Ciências de Saúde, Universidade Lúrio, Bairro de Marrere, R. Nr. 4250, Km 2,3, Nampula, Mozambique.
Raul MoraguesDepartamento Estadística Matemáticas E Informática, Universitas Miguel Hernandez, Av de La Universidad S/N 03202, Elche, Spain.
Inmaculada López-IzquierdoDepartamento de Física de La Materia Condensada, Universidad de Sevilla, Av. Reina Mercedes S/N 41012, Seville, Spain. ilopez9@us.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3065-9896
Pablo CaballeroDepartamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva Y Salud Pública E Historia de La Ciencia, Universitat d'Alacant, Carretera Sant Vicent del Raspeig S/N, 03690, Alacante, Sant Vicent del Raspeig, Spain.
Lúrio University · MZUniversity of Alicante · ESMinistry of Health · MZUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite advances in surgical techniques, cataract remains the leading cause of preventable blindness, and massive surgeries have been adopted as a strategy to change this situation. Monitoring the results of cataract surgeries has become imperative to ensure their quality. Therefore, this study aims to assess the cataract surgery outcomes performed at the Central Hospital of Nampula Mozambique.

methodsThis is a prospective and longitudinal study in which translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the visual function (VF) and quality of life (QoL) questionnaire were performed. The appearance, content, construct, criterion, internal consistency and responsiveness were validated using the most common methods and indicators. Visual acuity (VA), VF and QoL were evaluated on 447 patients before and after surgery by t-test and effect sizes.

resultsVF and QoL questionnaires showed one-dimension, good values of TLI (0.973, 0.951) and SRMR (0.057, 0.054), and for each item, weights > 0.7, H2 > 0.5, ranges > 5.8 and the RMSEA < 0.08. Correlations for criterion validity were high and for responsiveness were high for QoL and moderate for VF one and the ordinal Cronbach's alpha coefficients were greater than 0.97. Difference between VA, VF and QoL before and after surgery was statistically significant (p < 0.001). After surgery, 74.3% of patients had good, 23.5% had borderline and 2.2% had poor VA.

conclusionsThe cataract surgery outcomes are outside the WHO recommendations regarding VA, but they have had a great impact on improving VF and QoL. The questionnaires showed excellent psychometric properties and should be used in daily clinical practice to evaluate the results of cataract surgeries.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMozambiqueProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual AcuityCataract surgeryNampula, MozambiqueOutcomesQuality of lifeVisual acuityVisual function

Identifiers

PMID36625930
PMCPMC9830612
OpenAlexW4315436300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.