Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36625926›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2023

Lateral suspension with V-NOTES for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Salman-Ketenci Gencer technique.

Fatma Ketenci Gencer, Suleyman Salman, Serkan Kumbasar, Havva Betul Bacak, Ozlem Khatib, Cihan Kaya, Elif Yildiz, Enes Serhat Coskun

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatma Ketenci GencerIstanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Hizirefendi Street, 34255, Istanbul, Gaziosmanpasa, Turkey.
Suleyman SalmanIstanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Hizirefendi Street, 34255, Istanbul, Gaziosmanpasa, Turkey. sleymansalman@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7090-6105
Serkan KumbasarIstanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Hizirefendi Street, 34255, Istanbul, Gaziosmanpasa, Turkey.
Havva Betul BacakIstanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Hizirefendi Street, 34255, Istanbul, Gaziosmanpasa, Turkey.
Ozlem KhatibIstanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Hizirefendi Street, 34255, Istanbul, Gaziosmanpasa, Turkey.
Cihan KayaAcibadem Bakirkoy Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Elif YildizIstanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Hizirefendi Street, 34255, Istanbul, Gaziosmanpasa, Turkey.
Enes Serhat CoskunIstanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Hizirefendi Street, 34255, Istanbul, Gaziosmanpasa, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAcıbadem Adana Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common morbidity and 10-20% of the patients need surgical correction. Sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy procedures are satisfactory but still difficult. Lateral suspension (LS) as a safe and simple technique has become an alternative technique recently. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (V-NOTES) is also a new modality and LS using V-NOTES has not been performed previously and should be promising.

methodsThis prospective observational pilot study was conducted with a total of 38 women with stage 3 and 4 POP according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification grading system (POP-Q). Lateral suspension via V-NOTES was performed with the Salman-Ketenci Gencer technique using a mesh for POP. The preoperative and postoperative 6-month POP-Q stages together with Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) scores were recorded and compared.

resultsComparison of the preoperative and postoperative 6-month POP-Q stages of the patients were statistically significant except for the total vaginal length (p<0.01). Compared with the preoperative total and subscale scores of PISQ-12, the postoperative values were considerably improved (p<0.001).

conclusionsWith the Salman-Ketenci Gencer technique not only good anatomical but also good functional results were obtained with V-NOTES. Surgeons may focus on uterine sparing while using the Salman-Ketenci Gencer technique for apical prolapse owing to the higher rate of complications related to the colposuspension and better sexual results after the cervicosuspension.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseVaginaFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansProspective StudiesSurgical MeshSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUterusLateral suspensionPelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual QuestionnairePelvic organ prolapsusPISQ-12POP-QVaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36625926
OpenAlexW4315436658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.