Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36625923›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

The challenge of optimizing supports for people living with and beyond cancer: creating proximity between cancer and non-profit community-based providers.

Dominique Tremblay, Nassera Touati, Susan Usher, Barbara Gentil, Marie-Josée Courval

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring patients and caregivers needs and experiences in oncological physiotherapy: a call for collaborative care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dominique TremblaySchool of Nursing, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada. dominique.tremblay2@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-5681
Nassera TouatiÉcole nationale d'administration Publique, 4750 Ave Henri-Julien, 5E Étage, Montréal, Québec, H2T 3E5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-1850
Susan UsherCentre de Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-1908
Barbara GentilCentre de Recherche Charles-Le Moyne, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Marie-Josée CourvalCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CISSS) de la Montérégie-Centre, 3120 Boul. Taschereau, Greenfield Park, Québec, J4V 2H1, Canada.
École Nationale d'Administration Publique · CACentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches · CAHôpital Charles-Le Moyne · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNon-profit community-based organizations (CO) remain insufficiently integrated into cancer networks. Drawing on dimensions of proximity, this study explores how and why coordination between cancer teams and COs is established and solidified.

methodsA descriptive interpretive study is undertaken in Québec (Canada), where a cancer program has long promoted the integration of COs in the cancer trajectory. Semi-directed interviews with providers, managers and people living with and beyond cancer (total n = 46) explore the challenges of coordination between cancer and CO providers, along with facilitating or impeding factors. Three main themes related to coordination in cancer networks emerge, which are analyzed by operationalizing the multi-dimensional framework of proximity.

resultsFindings reveal a lack of cognitive proximity, which calls for efforts to both identify patient needs and increase cancer team knowledge and appreciation of CO resources. Organizational proximity refers to systems and rules that facilitate interactions, and we find that referral mechanisms and communication channels are inadequate, with patients often playing a linking role despite barriers. Coordination improves when relational proximity is established between cancer and CO teams, and this can be enhanced by geographic proximity; in one region, COs have a physical presence within the cancer center.

conclusionIntegrating COs into the cancer network can help meet the spectrum of needs faced by people living with and beyond cancer. This study offers managers and decision-makers insight into how coordination between cancer teams and COs can be supported. Proximity allows the distinct contributions of actors to be considered in context and contributes to understanding the "how" of integrated practice.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsCanadaHumansQuebecCancer careCommunity-based organizationsCoordinationProximityUnmet needs

Identifiers

PMID36625923
PMCPMC9831956
OpenAlexW4315436639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.