ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Modern imaging of the pulmonary hilum : Anatomy, pathologies, pitfalls].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModern medical imaging is a key component of efficient in- and out-patient precision medicine. Conventional radiography and computer tomography scans (CT) are among the most frequent radiologic exams. Medical imaging plays a key role in target-oriented medicine.
objectivesThe purpose of this article is to review the anatomy of the hilum of the lung and its most frequent associated pathologies since it is an important gateway of elementary structures of the thorax. Important signs and patterns for image interpretation in different modalities are also reviewed.
resultsThorough knowledge of anatomy, signs, and patterns of pathologies especially in conventional radiography and pitfalls of the more sensitive cross-sectional imaging is essential to support target-oriented patient care.
conclusionConventional radiography is affordable and readily available. It is very suitable for pathology screening, i.e., at the hilum of the lung. Cross-sectional imaging specifies diagnostics due to superior anatomic discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.