Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36625897›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Breastfeeding and the patient's perspective.

Aleksandra Polic, Kaitlin M Eutsler, Soha S Patel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aleksandra PolicVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. aleksandra.polic@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9852-8553
Kaitlin M EutslerVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Soha S PatelVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this article is to summarize available data on breastfeeding in patients with a cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA review of available literature in the MEDLINE database was performed and the data summarized. In addition, two patient interviews were conducted to gain insight into the patient perspective.

resultsBreastmilk is the nutritional standard for human infants and understanding the implications of a cancer diagnosis on lactation is important in optimizing maternal and infant outcomes. Though limited, available data suggest that breastfeeding may be a safe and appropriate option for some patients undergoing treatment of a malignancy.

conclusionsPatient experiences with breastfeeding in the setting of a cancer diagnosis vary widely, and depend on the type of malignancy, the timing of the diagnosis, and the indicated treatment. Breastfeeding may be an appropriate option for certain patients after multidisciplinary counseling. Alternatives to breastfeeding exist for patients who are unable to or do not desire to breastfeed.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingNeoplasmsFemaleHumansInfantLactationBreastfeedingCancerLactationPostpartumPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.