ArticleInternational wound journal2023
Preliminary evidence supporting a new enzymatic debridement product for use in chronic wounds.
Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Larval Therapy for Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- An In Vitro Artificial Wound Slough-Biofilm Model Developed for Evaluating a Novel Antibiofilm Technology.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Preliminary evidence supporting a new enzymatic debridement product for use in chronic wounds.International wound journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A new recombinant proteolytic enzyme, isolated from maggot saliva, with fibrinolytic action has been investigated through a series of non-clinical toxicology and in-vitro/in-vivo pharmacology studies to explore its potential safety and efficacy as an enzymatic debridement agent for use in chronic wounds. Studies indicate that the enzyme has a good safety profile. When locally administered, it is not detrimental to wound healing, is non-sensitising and is rapidly inactivated in the systemic circulation. Adverse effects are limited, at very high concentrations, to transient erythema at the site of application. In-vitro testing indicates that the enzyme, whilst selective for fibrin, has additional proteolytic action against collagen and elastin, with enzymatic action for all three substrates being dose dependent. In-vivo, we used an established MRSA biofilm model, in which microbiological counts were used as a surrogate for debridement efficacy. Here, we showed that higher concentrations of the enzyme in a formulated proprietary gel, significantly reduced MRSA counts over a period of 2 to 14 days, and significantly improved the vascularity of the wound at 14 days. Together, these data support the potential for this maggot-derived proteolytic enzyme as a clinically effective debriding agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.