Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36625121›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2023

The New Era of High-Throughput Nanoelectrochemistry.

Xiangdong Xu, Dimitrios Valavanis, Paolo Ciocci, Samuel Confederat, Fabio Marcuccio, Jean-François Lemineur, Paolo Actis, Frédéric Kanoufi, Patrick R Unwin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Electrodeposition of Zn nanoparticlesNanoscale advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ACS electrochemistry · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiangdong XuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-1120-4661
Dimitrios ValavanisDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8777-664X
Paolo CiocciUniversité Paris Cité, ITODYS, CNRS, F-75013 Paris, France.
Samuel ConfederatSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Pollard Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.
Fabio MarcuccioSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Pollard Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-4816-2896
Jean-François LemineurUniversité Paris Cité, ITODYS, CNRS, F-75013 Paris, France.
Paolo ActisSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Pollard Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7146-1854
Frédéric KanoufiUniversité Paris Cité, ITODYS, CNRS, F-75013 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9784-2380
Patrick R UnwinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3106-2178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID36625121
PMCPMC9835065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.