Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624991›Full record

SynthesisCartilage2023

Prognostic Factors for the Clinical Outcome after Microfracture Treatment of Chondral and Osteochondral Defects in the Knee Joint: A Systematic Review.

Iris M van Tuijn, Kaj S Emanuel, Pieter P W van Hugten, Ralph Jeuken, Pieter J Emans

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cartilage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pediatric osteochondral fractures: clinical insights associate early diagnosis to early rehabilitation via arthroscopy.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Treatment of Chondral Lesions in the Knee.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iris M van TuijnDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preserving Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6201-1624
Kaj S EmanuelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preserving Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pieter P W van HugtenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preserving Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ralph JeukenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preserving Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7729-8800
Pieter J EmansDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Preserving Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to establish which patient and lesion characteristics are related to the clinical outcome after microfracture of cartilage defects in the knee. STUDY

designSystematic review.

methodsAfter preregistration, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies that analyzed prognostic factors for the outcome of microfracture treatment in the knee. The criteria for inclusion were outcome measured using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), a clinical study with ≥10 participants receiving microfracture, and a minimal follow-up period of 1 year.

resultsFor none of the investigated prognostic factors, effect size reporting was sufficiently homogeneous to conduct a meta-analysis. However, a majority of the included studies identified higher age, larger lesion size, longer preoperative symptom duration, and previous surgery on the ipsilateral knee, especially meniscectomy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, as factors that are reported to be correlated to a less favorable outcome. A lesion location that does not include the trochlea or the patellofemoral joint and is not weightbearing, a nondegenerative mechanism of injury, and a single lesion were reported as factors that predict a favorable outcome. As to gender, body mass index, preoperative activity level, smoking, and concomitant knee surgery, the included articles were inconclusive or no effect was reported.

conclusionsSeveral factors correlated with the clinical result after microfracture treatment. However, the information on the effect sizes of the influence on clinical outcome is incomplete due to poor reporting. Large-scale registries or pooling of homogeneous, well-reported data is needed to work toward prognostic models. That would be an important step toward personalized treatment.

Indexed as

Cartilage DiseasesFractures, StressHumansKnee JointMeniscectomyPrognosisbone marrow stimulationosteochondral defectrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36624991
PMCPMC10076892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.