ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2023
Theoretical performance of progressive addition lenses with poorly measured individual parameters.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses on Visual Functions in Young Adults: A Comprehensive Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Assessment of Visual Quality Improvement as a Result of Spectacle Personalization.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Theoretical performance of progressive addition lenses with poorly measured individual parameters.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this paper was to present a theoretical study of how poorly measured individual parameters affect the optical performance of progressive addition lenses (PALs). Modern progressive lenses can be prescribed based on parameters such as vertex distance, pantoscopic and wrap angles. These parameters can be measured from the lens wearer using specific devices; however, not all of them can be measured with the same precision, and the impact of measurement errors on the lens performance is still unknown.
methodsData from 1900 patients were used to simulate the performance of four PAL designs with different degrees of complexity: perfect individual design, individual design with induced errors in the individual parameters, optimised design and conventional/basic design. For each patient and design, a quality metric was calculated to describe the optical performance of the lens.
resultsThe design having the best performance was the perfect individual design, followed by the individual design with induced errors, the optimised design and finally the conventional/basic design.
conclusionsIndividual designs with measurement errors have better optical performance than lenses with less complexity, such as the optimised or conventional designs. This knowledge is useful for the eye care professional to make informed choices when dispensing these lenses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.