Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624807›Full record

ArticleSN computer science2023

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of 18 Deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Models with Transfer Learning to Diagnose COVID-19 on Chest X-Ray (CXR) Images.

Li Sze Chow, Goon Sheng Tang, Mahmud Iwan Solihin, Nadia Muhammad Gowdh, Norlisah Ramli, Kartini Rahmat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li Sze ChowDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, 1, Jalan Puncak Menara Gading, Taman Connaught, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3877-4434
Goon Sheng TangDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, 1, Jalan Puncak Menara Gading, Taman Connaught, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Mahmud Iwan SolihinDepartment of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Technology and Built Environment, UCSI University, 1, Jalan Puncak Menara Gading, Taman Connaught, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Nadia Muhammad GowdhDepartment of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Norlisah RamliDepartment of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Kartini RahmatDepartment of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a disease caused by a novel strain of coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), severely affecting the lungs. Our study aims to combine both quantitative and qualitative analysis of the convolutional neural network (CNN) model to diagnose COVID-19 on chest X-ray (CXR) images. We investigated 18 state-of-the-art CNN models with transfer learning, which include AlexNet, DarkNet-19, DarkNet-53, DenseNet-201, GoogLeNet, Inception-ResNet-v2, Inception-v3, MobileNet-v2, NasNet-Large, NasNet-Mobile, ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, ShuffleNet, SqueezeNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, and Xception. Their performances were evaluated quantitatively using six assessment metrics: specificity, sensitivity, precision, negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1-score. The top four models with accuracy higher than 90% are VGG-16, ResNet-101, VGG-19, and SqueezeNet. The accuracy of these top four models is between 90.7% and 94.3%; the F1-score is between 90.8% and 94.3%. The VGG-16 scored the highest accuracy of 94.3% and F1-score of 94.3%. The majority voting with all the 18 CNN models and top 4 models produced an accuracy of 93.0% and 94.0%, respectively. The top four and bottom three models were chosen for the qualitative analysis. A gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to visualize the significant region of activation for the decision-making of image classification. Two certified radiologists performed blinded subjective voting on the Grad-CAM images in comparison with their diagnosis. The qualitative analysis showed that SqueezeNet is the closest model to the diagnosis of two certified radiologists. It demonstrated a competitively good accuracy of 90.7% and F1-score of 90.8% with 111 times fewer parameters and 7.7 times faster than VGG-16. Therefore, this study recommends both VGG-16 and SqueezeNet as additional tools for the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networks (CNN)COVID-19Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM)Transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36624807
PMCPMC9813876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.