Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624785›Full record

ArticleExpert systems with applications2023

Deep transfer learning approaches for Monkeypox disease diagnosis.

Md Manjurul Ahsan, Muhammad Ramiz Uddin, Md Shahin Ali, Md Khairul Islam, Mithila Farjana, Ahmed Nazmus Sakib, Khondhaker Al Momin, Shahana Akter Luna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert systems with applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Md Manjurul AhsanIndustrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Muhammad Ramiz UddinDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Md Shahin AliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Islamic University, Kushtia 7003, Bangladesh.
Md Khairul IslamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Islamic University, Kushtia 7003, Bangladesh.
Mithila FarjanaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Ahmed Nazmus SakibDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Khondhaker Al MominDepartment of Civil Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, 1341, Bangladesh.
Shahana Akter LunaMedicine & Surgery, Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkeypox has become a significant global challenge as the number of cases increases daily. Those infected with the disease often display various skin symptoms and can spread the infection through contamination. Recently, Machine Learning (ML) has shown potential in image-based diagnoses, such as detecting cancer, identifying tumor cells, and identifying coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 patients. Thus, ML could potentially be used to diagnose Monkeypox as well. In this study, we developed a Monkeypox diagnosis model using Generalization and Regularization-based Transfer Learning approaches (GRA-TLA) for binary and multiclass classification. We tested our proposed approach on ten different convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models in three separate studies. The preliminary computational results showed that our proposed approach, combined with Extreme Inception (Xception), was able to distinguish between individuals with and without Monkeypox with an accuracy ranging from 77% to 88% in Studies One and Two, while Residual Network (ResNet)-101 had the best performance for multiclass classification in Study Three, with an accuracy ranging from 84% to 99%. In addition, we found that our proposed approach was computationally efficient compared to existing TL approaches in terms of the number of parameters (NP) and Floating-Point Operations per Second (FLOPs) required. We also used Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) to explain our model's predictions and feature extractions, providing a deeper understanding of the specific features that may indicate the onset of Monkeypox.

Indexed as

Deep learningDisease diagnosisImage processingMachine learningMonkeypox virus

Identifiers

PMID36624785
PMCPMC9814470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.