ArticleHippocampus2023
Stimulation-induced entrainment of hippocampal network activity: Identifying optimal input frequencies.
Article in Hippocampus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Network reorganization of anterograde thalamic connectivity during non-periodic patterned deep brain stimulation.iScience · 2026Article
- Gamma entrainment induced by deep brain stimulation as a biomarker for motor improvement with neuromodulation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Input/Output Relationships for the Primary Hippocampal Circuit.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Stimulation-induced entrainment of hippocampal network activity: Identifying optimal input frequencies.Hippocampus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The hippocampus contains rich oscillatory activity, with continuous ebbs and flows of rhythmic currents that constrain its ability to integrate inputs. During associative learning, the hippocampus must integrate inputs from a range of sources carrying information about events and the contexts in which they occur. Under these circumstances, temporal coordination of activity between sender and receiver is likely essential for successful communication. Previously, it has been shown that the coordination of rhythmic activity between the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC) and the CA1 region of the hippocampus is tightly correlated with the onset of learning in an associative learning task. We aimed to examine whether rhythmic inputs from the LEC in specific frequency ranges were sufficient to enhance the temporal coordination of activity in downstream CA1. In urethane-anesthetized rats, we applied extracellular low-intensity alternating current stimulation across the length of the LEC. Using this method, we aimed to phase-bias ongoing neuronal activity in LEC at a range of different frequencies (from 1.25 to 55 Hz). Rhythmic stimulation of LEC at both 35 and 50 Hz increased the proportion of CA1 neurons significantly entrained to the phase of the applied stimulation current. A subset of stimulation frequencies modified CA1 spiking relationships to the phase of local ongoing CA1 oscillations, with each stimulation frequency exerting a unique influence upon downstream CA1, often in frequency ranges outside the target stimulation frequency. These results suggest there are optimal frequencies for LEC-CA1 communication, and that different profiles of LEC rhythms likely have distinct outcomes upon CA1 processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.