Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624506›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2023

The semi-automated development of plant cell wall finite element models.

Andrew Sayad, Yusuf Oduntan, Norbert Bokros, Seth DeBolt, Alice Benzecry, Daniel J Robertson, Christopher J Stubbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew SayadSchool of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, USA.
Yusuf OduntanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Norbert BokrosDepartment of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA.
Seth DeBoltDepartment of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA.
Alice BenzecryDepartment of Biological Sciences, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, USA.
Daniel J RobertsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Christopher J StubbsSchool of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ, USA. cstubbs@fdu.edu.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-10917National Science Foundation 1826715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a methodology for a high-throughput digitization and quantification process of plant cell walls characterization, including the automated development of two-dimensional finite element models. Custom algorithms based on machine learning can also analyze the cellular microstructure for phenotypes such as cell size, cell wall curvature, and cell wall orientation. To demonstrate the utility of these models, a series of compound microscope images of both herbaceous and woody representatives were observed and processed. In addition, parametric analyses were performed on the resulting finite element models. Sensitivity analyses of the structural stiffness of the resulting tissue based on the cell wall elastic modulus and the cell wall thickness; demonstrated that the cell wall thickness has a three-fold larger impact of tissue stiffness than cell wall elastic modulus.

Identifiers

PMID36624506
PMCPMC9827646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.