Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624412›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Social innovation in health: strengthening Community Systems for Universal Health Coverage in rural areas.

Lindi van Niekerk, Martha Milena Bautista-Gomez, Barwani Khaura Msiska, Jana Deborah B Mier-Alpaño, Arturo M Ongkeko, Lenore Manderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Lindi van NiekerkLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Martha Milena Bautista-GomezCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Médicas (CIDEIM), Cali, Colombia.
Barwani Khaura MsiskaCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. barwanimsiska@gmail.com.
Jana Deborah B Mier-AlpañoCollege of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Arturo M OngkekoNational Institutes of Health, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Lenore MandersonUniversity of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Philippines Manila · PHCentro Internacional de Entrenamiento e Investigaciones Medicas · COLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Malawi · MWUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn seeking the attainment of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), there has been a renewed emphasis on the role of communities. This article focuses on social innovation and whether this concept holds promise to enhance equity in health services to achieve UHC and serve as a process to enhance community engagement, participation, and agency.

methodsA cross-country case study methodology was adopted to analyze three social innovations in health in three low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): Philippines, Malawi, and Colombia. Qualitative methods were used in data collection, and a cross-case analysis was conducted with the aid of a simplified version of the conceptual framework on social innovation as proposed by Cajaiba-Santana. This framework proposes four dimensions of social innovation as a process at different levels of action: the actors responsible for the idea, the new idea, the role of the institutional environment, and the resultant changes in the health and social system.

resultsThe study found that each of the three social innovation case studies was based on developing community capacities to achieve health through community co-learning, leadership, and accountability. The process was dependent on catalytic agents, creating a space for innovation within the institutional context. In so doing, these agents challenged the prevailing power dynamics by providing the communities with respect and the opportunity to participate equally in creating and implementing programs. In this way, communities were empowered; they were not simply participants but became active agents in conceptualizing, implementing, monitoring, and sustaining the social innovation initiatives.

conclusionThe study has illustrated how three creative social innovation approaches improved access and quality of health services for vulnerable rural populations and increased agency among the intervention communities. The processes facilitated empowerment, which in turn supported the sustained strengthening of the community system and the achievement of community goals in the domain of health and beyond.

Indexed as

EmpowermentUniversal Health InsuranceColombiaHumansMalawiPhilippinesAgencyCommunity empowermentSocial innovation in healthUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID36624412
PMCPMC9827696
OpenAlexW4313815582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.