ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023
Combining Melphalan Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab in Advanced Uveal Melanoma: First Safety and Efficacy Data from the Phase Ib Part of the Chopin Trial.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04283890 (Phase1b/2 Study Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion With Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab in Advanced Uveal Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase1b/2 Study Combining Hepatic Percutaneous Perfusion With Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab in Advanced Uveal Melanoma
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systemic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- An Open-label, Randomized Study of Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of the Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results from an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Phase 3 Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Trial
- Tolerability and efficacy of chemosaturation in combination with systemic therapy for metastatic uveal melanoma.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the molecular genetic mechanisms and immune microenvironment of uveal melanoma.Melanoma research · 2026Review
- Yttrium-90 Radioembolization as a Safe and Effective Treatment Option for Hepatic Uveal Melanoma Metastases.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Characterization of long-term survivors with liver metastases from uveal melanoma diagnosed between 2005 and 2021.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Functions and clinical implications of the liver microenvironment in hepatic uveal melanoma metastases.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Successful use of nivolumab and relatlimab as salvage therapy for metastatic uveal melanoma.Melanoma research · 2025Article
- Management of liver metastases from uveal melanoma.The British journal of surgery · 2025Review
- ASO Author Reflections: Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System Versus Best Alternative Care for Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- State-of-the-art in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Treatment: A 2025 Update : How to treat Metastatic Uveal Melanoma in 2025.Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Current Therapies and Potential Strategies for Uveal Melanoma.Drugs and drug candidates · 2025Article
- Current Treatment of Uveal Melanoma.Cancers · 2025Review
- ASO Author Reflections: Optimizing Line of Therapy with the Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Meeting Report From the 2023 Cure Ocular Melanoma (CURE OM) Global Science Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, November 2023.Pigment cell & melanoma research · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion: Past, Present, and Future.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- The Future of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Uveal Melanoma: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo define a safe treatment dose of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) when applied in combination with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (NCT04283890), primary objective was defining a safe treatment dose of IPI/NIVO plus M-PHP. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (CTCAEv4.03). Secondary objective was response rate, PFS and OS. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients between 18-75 years with confirmed measurable hepatic mUM according to RECIST 1.1 and WHO performance score 0-1 were included. Intravenous IPI was applied at 1 mg/kg while NIVO dose was increased from 1 mg/kg in cohort 1 to 3 mg/kg in cohort 2. Transarterial melphalan dose for M-PHP was 3 mg/kg (maximum of 220 mg) in both cohorts. Treatment duration was 12 weeks, consisting of four 3-weekly courses IPI/NIVO and two 6-weekly M-PHPs.
resultsSeven patients were included with a median age of 63.6 years (range 50-74). Both dose levels were well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities or deaths. Grade III/IV adverse events (AE) were observed in 2/3 patients in cohort 1 and in 3/4 patients in cohort 2, including Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), febrile neutropenia and cholecystitis. Grade I/II immune-related AEs occurred in all patients, including myositis, hypothyroidism, hepatitis and dermatitis. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The safe IPI/NIVO dose was defined as IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg. There was 1 complete response, 5 partial responses and 1 stable disease (3 ongoing responses with a median FU of 29.1 months).
conclusionCombining M-PHP with IPI/NIVO was safe in this small cohort of patients with mUM at a dose of IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.