Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624218›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Anastomotic perfusion assessment with indocyanine green in robot-assisted low-anterior resection, a multicenter study of interobserver variation.

Pernille O Larsen, Nikolaj Nerup, Jesper Andersen, Niclas Dohrn, Mads Falk Klein, Steffen Brisling, Soren Salomon, Per V Andersen, Soren Möller, Morten B S Svendsen and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04766060 (Indocyanine Green Enhanced Fluorescent Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04766060 completednot on this map

Indocyanine Green Enhanced Fluorescent Angiography: Can it Predict Anastomotic Leakage (AL) After Recto-sigmoid Resection for Malignancy, and Are we Able to Evaluate the Findings? -A Small Multi-centre Trial Study

TypeobservationalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled55ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Anastomotic LeakArmsFluorescent Imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AUGUR-AIM: Clinical validation of an artificial intelligence indocyanine green fluorescence angiography expert representer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Pernille O LarsenResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Pernille.oehlenschlager.larsen0@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5883-2657
Nikolaj NerupDepartment of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper AndersenSurgical Department, Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beridderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Niclas DohrnDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mads Falk KleinDepartment of Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steffen BrislingCenter for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Soren SalomonResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Per V AndersenResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Soren MöllerOpen Patient Data Explorative Network, OPEN, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Morten B S SvendsenCAMES Engineering, Copenhagen Academy of Medical Education and Simulation, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans B RahrSurgical Department, Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beridderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark.
Lene H IversenDepartment of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ismail GögenurCenter for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Niels QvistResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Mark B EllebaekResearch Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKGentofte Hospital · DKVejle Sygehus · DKZealand University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecuring sufficient blood perfusion to the anastomotic area after low-anterior resection is a crucial factor in preventing anastomotic leakage (AL). Intra-operative indocyanine green fluorescent imaging (ICG-FI) has been suggested as a tool to assess perfusion. However, knowledge of inter-observer variation among surgeons in the interpretation of ICG-FI is sparse. Our primary objective was to evaluate inter-observer variation among surgeons in the interpretation of bowel blood-perfusion assessed visually by ICG-FI. Our secondary objective was to compare the results both from the visual assessment of ICG and from computer-based quantitative analyses of ICG-FI between patients with and without the development of AL.

methodA multicenter study, including patients undergoing robot-assisted low anterior resection with stapled anastomosis. ICG-FI was evaluated visually by the surgeon intra-operatively. Postoperatively, recorded videos were anonymized and exchanged between centers for inter-observer evaluation. Time to visibility (TTV), time to maximum visibility (TMV), and time to wash-out (TWO) were visually assessed. In addition, the ICG-FI video-recordings were analyzed using validated pixel analysis software to quantify blood perfusion.

resultsFifty-five patients were included, and five developed clinical AL. Bland-Altman plots (BA plots) demonstrated wide inter-observer variation for visually assessed fluorescence on all parameters (TTV, TMV, and TWO). Comparing leak-group with no-leak group, we found no significant differences for TTV: Hazard Ratio; HR = 0.82 (CI 0.32; 2.08), TMV: HR = 0.62 (CI 0.24; 1.59), or TWO: HR = 1.11 (CI 0.40; 3.11). In the quantitative pixel analysis, a lower slope of the fluorescence time-curve was found in patients with a subsequent leak: median 0.08 (0.07;0.10) compared with non-leak patients: median 0.13 (0.10;0.17) (p = 0.04).

conclusionThe surgeon's visual assessment of the ICG-FI demonstrated wide inter-observer variation, there were no differences between patients with and without AL. However, quantitative pixel analysis showed a significant difference between groups.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04766060.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLaparoscopyRoboticsAnastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakFluorescein AngiographyHumansIndocyanine GreenObserver VariationPerfusionIndocyanine GreenAnastomotic leakageColorectal surgeryFluorescenceInter-observer variationq-ICG

Identifiers

PMID36624218
PMCPMC10156761
OpenAlexW4313837510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.