Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36624183›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2023

Application of real-time quaking-induced conversion in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance.

Peter Hermann, Matthias Schmitz, Maria Cramm, Stefan Goebel, Timothy Bunck, Julia Schütte-Schmidt, Walter Schulz-Schaeffer, Christine Stadelmann, Jakob Matschke, Markus Glatzel and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-jakob disease: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other prion diseases.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter HermannDepartment of Neurology, National Reference Center for CJD Surveillance, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Street 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany. peter.hermann@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Matthias SchmitzDepartment of Neurology, National Reference Center for CJD Surveillance, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Street 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Maria CrammDepartment of Neurology, National Reference Center for CJD Surveillance, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Street 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Stefan GoebelDepartment of Neurology, National Reference Center for CJD Surveillance, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Street 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Timothy BunckDepartment of Neurology, National Reference Center for CJD Surveillance, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Street 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Julia Schütte-SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, National Reference Center for CJD Surveillance, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Street 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Walter Schulz-SchaefferInstitute of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty of the Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Christine StadelmannInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Jakob MatschkeInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus GlatzelInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Inga ZerrDepartment of Neurology, National Reference Center for CJD Surveillance, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch Street 40, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversität Hamburg · DESaarland University · DE

Funding

Robert-Koch-Institute 1369-341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of the application of CSF real-time quaking-induced conversion in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease surveillance to investigate test accuracy, influencing factors, and associations with disease incidence.

methodsIn a prospective surveillance study, CSF real-time quaking-induced conversion was performed in patients with clinical suspicion of prion disease (2014-2022). Clinically or histochemically characterized patients with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (n = 888) and patients with final diagnosis of non-prion disease (n = 371) were included for accuracy and association studies.

resultsThe overall test sensitivity for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease was 90% and the specificity 99%. Lower sensitivity was associated with early disease stage (p = 0.029) and longer survival (p < 0.001). The frequency of false positives was significantly higher in patients with inflammatory CNS diseases (3.7%) than in other diagnoses (0.4%, p = 0.027). The incidence increased from 1.7 per million person-years (2006-2017) to 2.0 after the test was added to diagnostic the criteria (2018-2021).

conclusionWe validated high diagnostic accuracy of CSF real-time quaking-induced conversion but identified inflammatory brain disease as a potential source of (rare) false-positive results, indicating thorough consideration of this condition in the differential diagnosis of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The surveillance improved after amendment of the diagnostic criteria, whereas the incidence showed no suggestive alterations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Creutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCreutzfeldt–Jakob diseaseDiagnosisEpidemiologyPrionRT-QuIC

Identifiers

PMID36624183
PMCPMC9829526
OpenAlexW4313892390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.