ArticleClinical rheumatology2023
Does the use of nail cosmetics interfere with the reporting of nailfold capillaroscopy?
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capillaroscopy is a non-invasive tool evaluating the nail-fold capillaries, especially in approach to Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and scleroderma (SSc) spectrum of diseases. It was recommended that the patients should not use any cosmetic procedure involving the nailfold to avoid misinterpretations. Therefore, we aimed to find the problems of using or recent removal of the nail polishes/artificial nails/henna before doing capillaroscopy. During 10 years, we looked for all capillaroscopy reports and nail fold images of patients who referred for capillaroscopy and had used or recently removed nail polish/artificial nail/henna in order to find the presence of any artifacts or misinterpretations in reports. Sixty-three patients were identified that had used or removed the nail cosmetic during 10 days before capillaroscopy. In patients who used nail polish, removed their nail polish, used artificial nails, or removed the artificial nails, and those using henna, 16.2%, 36.4%, 3.8%, 0%, and 1.4% of nail folds showed some stains in the upper part of the nail fold area, respectively, that had no interference with the report due to their distinct color. However, few areas were covered with polish stains in patients who removed the polish recently. The presence of nail cosmetics including nail polishes, henna, and artificial nails at the time of capillaroscopy does not induce a significant misinterpretation in capillaroscopy. However, some colored stains which were mostly distinguishable from hemorrhages could be seen. The removal of them 10 days before the time of capillaroscopy did not decrease the cosmetic artifacts. Key Points • The presence of nail cosmetics including nail polishes, henna, and artificial nails at the time of capillaroscopy does not induce a significant misinterpretation in capillaroscopy. • The removal of nail polish 10 days before the time of capillaroscopy did not decrease the procedure artifacts. • The removal of nail polish 10 days before capillaroscopy increased the area of artifacts and coverage of the study background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.