Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36623850›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2023

Comparative analysis of prebiotic effects of four oligosaccharides using in vitro gut model: digestibility, microbiome, and metabolome changes.

Seongwon Cheon, Geonhee Kim, Jae-Han Bae, Dong Hyeon Lee, Hyunbin Seong, Da Hye Kim, Jung-Sook Han, Su-Youn Lim, Nam Soo Han

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Viability and probiotic activity ofFood science and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seongwon CheonBrain Korea 21 Center for Bio-Health Industry, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.
Geonhee KimBrain Korea 21 Center for Bio-Health Industry, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Han BaeBrain Korea 21 Center for Bio-Health Industry, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0283-9702
Dong Hyeon LeeBrain Korea 21 Center for Bio-Health Industry, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.
Hyunbin SeongBrain Korea 21 Center for Bio-Health Industry, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.
Da Hye KimBrain Korea 21 Center for Bio-Health Industry, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Sook HanSamyang Corp. 295 Pangyo-ro, Samyang Corporation Food Biotech R&D Center, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-do 13488, Republic of Korea.
Su-Youn LimSamyang Corp. 295 Pangyo-ro, Samyang Corporation Food Biotech R&D Center, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-do 13488, Republic of Korea.
Nam Soo HanBrain Korea 21 Center for Bio-Health Industry, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8460-8165
Chungbuk National University · KRSamyang Holdings (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fructooligosaccharides (FOS), Ad-fructooligosaccharides (Ad-FOS), resistant maltodextrin (RMD), and maltooligosaccharides (MOS) are commercially available prebiotic oligosaccharides. In this study, the effects of prebiotics on the human gut microbial ecosystem were evaluated using an in vitro gut model. FOS and Ad-FOS showed tolerance to digestion, whereas RMD and MOS showed moderate digestion by digestive enzymes. In in vitro fecal fermentation, Bifidobacterium spp. increased in the following order: FOS, Ad-FOS, MOS, and RMD, whereas Bacteroides spp. increased in RMD medium. Bacteroides xylanisolvens exhibited cross-feeding by enabling the growth of other beneficial bacteria during co-culture in RMD medium. In metabolome analysis, total short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were highly produced in the following order: RMD, FOS, MOS, and Ad-FOS; acetate in the order of FOS, MOS/RMD, and Ad-FOS; butyrate in the order of RMD, MOS, FOS, and Ad-FOS; and propionate only in RMD. In addition, the conversion of betaine to trimethylamine was rarely affected in the following order: MOS, RMD, FOS, and Ad-FOS. Lastly, the four oligosaccharides inhibited the adhesion of pathogenic Escherichia coli to human epithelial cells to a similar extent. The comparative analysis results obtained in this study will provide comprehensive information of these substances to manufacturers and customers.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPrebioticsFecesFermentationHumansMetabolomeOligosaccharidesOligosaccharidesPrebioticsfructooligosaccharidemaltooligosaccharidemetabolomemicrobiomeprebioticresistant maltodextrin

Identifiers

PMID36623850
PMCPMC9875365
OpenAlexW4313892700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.