ArticleMethods of information in medicine2023
Synthetic Tabular Data Evaluation in the Health Domain Covering Resemblance, Utility, and Privacy Dimensions.
Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the quality of tabular synthetic data in health care.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- An ELIXIR scoping review on domain-specific evaluation metrics for synthetic data in life sciences.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Methods for Generating and Evaluating Synthetic Longitudinal Patient Data: A Systematic Review.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Review
- AI-driven synthetic data generation for accelerating hepatology research: A study of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Article
- Adaptive refinement and prompt-guided conditioning for clinically realistic LLM-generated synthetic pediatric data.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Privacy-by-Design Approach to Generate Two Virtual Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis and Release Them as Open Datasets: Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Synthetic Tabular Data Generation Under Horizontal Federated Learning Environments in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Case-Based Simulation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Article
- How good is your synthetic data? SynthRO, a dashboard to evaluate and benchmark synthetic tabular data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A scoping review of privacy and utility metrics in medical synthetic data.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Comprehensive evaluation framework for synthetic tabular data in health: fidelity, utility and privacy analysis of generative models with and without privacy guarantees.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Anonymize or synthesize? Privacy-preserving methods for heart failure score analytics.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- GAN-Based Novel Approach for Generating Synthetic Medical Tabular Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Using UMAP for Partially Synthetic Healthcare Tabular Data Generation and Validation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Does Differentially Private Synthetic Data Lead to Synthetic Discoveries?Methods of information in medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative assessment of synthetic time series generation approaches in healthcare: leveraging patient metadata for accurate data synthesis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Assessment of differentially private synthetic data for utility and fairness in end-to-end machine learning pipelines for tabular data.PloS one · 2024Article
- dsSynthetic: synthetic data generation for the DataSHIELD federated analysis system.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSynthetic tabular data generation is a potentially valuable technology with great promise for data augmentation and privacy preservation. However, prior to adoption, an empirical assessment of generated synthetic tabular data is required across dimensions relevant to the target application to determine its efficacy. A lack of standardized and objective evaluation and benchmarking strategy for synthetic tabular data in the health domain has been found in the literature.
objectiveThe aim of this paper is to identify key dimensions, per dimension metrics, and methods for evaluating synthetic tabular data generated with different techniques and configurations for health domain application development and to provide a strategy to orchestrate them.
methodsBased on the literature, the resemblance, utility, and privacy dimensions have been prioritized, and a collection of metrics and methods for their evaluation are orchestrated into a complete evaluation pipeline. This way, a guided and comparative assessment of generated synthetic tabular data can be done, categorizing its quality into three categories ("
resultsThe synthetic tabular data generated with the four selected approaches has maintained resemblance, utility, and privacy for most datasets and synthetic tabular data generation approach combination. In several datasets, some approaches have outperformed others, while in other datasets, more than one approach has yielded the same performance.
conclusionThe results have shown that the proposed pipeline can effectively be used to evaluate and benchmark the synthetic tabular data generated by various synthetic tabular data generation approaches. Therefore, this pipeline can support the scientific community in selecting the most suitable synthetic tabular data generation approaches for their data and application of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.