Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36623248›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Idecabtagene Vicleucel for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Real-World Experience From the Myeloma CAR T Consortium.

Doris K Hansen, Surbhi Sidana, Lauren C Peres, Christelle Colin Leitzinger, Leyla Shune, Alexandria Shrewsbury, Rebecca Gonzalez, Douglas W Sborov, Charlotte Wagner, Danai Dima and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
59.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 263 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Doris K HansenH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-9813-3578
Surbhi SidanaStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3288-7614
Lauren C PeresH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-6620-8600
Christelle Colin LeitzingerH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-9591
Leyla ShuneThe University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Alexandria ShrewsburyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Rebecca GonzalezH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0003-0024-0699
Douglas W SborovThe University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0003-4268-2698
Charlotte WagnerThe University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0003-0568-0781
Danai DimaCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-3587-7975
Hamza HashmiMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Mehmet H KocogluUniversity of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-9888-5737
Shebli AtrashLevine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4547-7534
Gary SimmonsVirginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA.
Nilesh KalariyaThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Christopher FerreriThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Aimaz AfroughUT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-2645-8557
Ankit KansagraUT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-0782
Peter VoorheesLevine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-718X
Rachid BazH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-4733
Jack KhouriCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-6528
Melissa AlsinaH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Joseph McGuirkThe University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-4796
Frederick L LockeH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-9063-6691
Krina K PatelThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · USLevine Cancer Institute · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USMedical University of South Carolina · USStanford University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIdecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) is an autologous B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) on the basis of the phase II pivotal KarMMa trial, which demonstrated best overall and ≥ complete response rates of 73% and 33%, respectively. We report clinical outcomes with standard-of-care (SOC) ide-cel under the commercial Food and Drug Administration label.

methodsData were retrospectively collected from patients with RRMM who underwent leukapheresis as of February 28, 2022, at 11 US institutions with intent to receive SOC ide-cel. Toxicities were graded per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy guidelines and managed according to each institution's policies. Responses were graded on the basis of the International Myeloma Working Group response criteria.

resultsOne hundred fifty-nine of 196 leukapheresed patients received ide-cel by data cutoff. One hundred twenty (75%) infused patients would have been ineligible for participation in the KarMMa clinical trial because of comorbidities at the time of leukapheresis. Any grade and grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 82/3% and 18/6%, respectively. Best overall and ≥ complete response rates were 84% and 42%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 6.1 months from chimeric antigen receptor T infusion, the median progression-free survival was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.5 to not reached) and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI, 11.3 to not reached). Patients with previous exposure to B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy, high-risk cytogenetics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 at lymphodepletion, and younger age had inferior progression-free survival on multivariable analysis.

conclusionThe safety and efficacy of ide-cel in patients with RRMM in the SOC setting were comparable with those in the phase II pivotal KarMMa trial despite most patients (75%) not meeting trial eligibility criteria.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenB-Cell Maturation AntigenCytokine Release SyndromeHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveRetrospective StudiesB-Cell Maturation Antigenidecabtagene vicleucelReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36623248
PMCPMC10082273
OpenAlexW4313893014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.