ReviewNursing open2023
Development and psychometric appraisal of Head Nurse Research Leadership Scale.
Review in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a motivation scale for health behavior change in patients with coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Development and Reliability Test of the Intravenous Thrombolysis Intention Scale for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.Nursing open · 2026Article
- The Mediating Role of Nurses' Organizational Innovation Climate on the Relationship Between Head Nurses' Research-Innovation Leadership and Nurses' Innovation Behavior in China: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- Article
- The impact of leadership of head nurses on the research performance of highly educated nurses in China: a moderated mediation model.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the missed intensive nursing care scale.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- The Impact of Nursing Heads Leadership on Research Innovation Behavior of Junior Nurses with Master's Degree: The Mediation of Perceived Barriers and the Moderation of Motivation.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop a Head Nurse Research Leadership Scale and evaluate its reliability and validity.
designA psychometric instrument validation study was conducted in two phases.
methodsThe item tool was generated based on a literature review, semi-structured interview and brainstorming. Twenty experts validated the content of the initial version for two rounds. Thirty-nine clinical nurses conducted the HNRLS-v3 to test the readability of the items in pilot study I. Items were screened based on the critical ratio, correlation coefficient analysis, Cronbach's α coefficient and factor analysis using the data collected from 265 nurses in pilot study II. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six hospitals to evaluate the reliability and validity between 4 January 2022 and 15 January 2022. Three hundred and sixteen nurses participated in this survey, and 60 completed the questionnaire to validate the test-retest reliability between 1 February and 6 February.
resultsA 15-item Head Nurse Research Leadership Scale based on 5 dimensions was developed, and the content validity was satisfied. The 15 items accounted for 77.9% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable convergent validity and discriminant validity. The Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability of the scale were 0.966, 0.9633 and 0.927, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.