ArticleEndocrine2023
Patients undergoing endocrine consultation and first diagnosis of nodular disease: Indications of thyroid ultrasound and completeness of ultrasound reports.
Article in Endocrine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate reasons for performing ultrasonography (US) and completeness of US reports in patients undergoing endocrine consultation with the first diagnosis of nodular disease.
methodsSince January 1 to June 30, 2021, we prospectively collected patient data (age and thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations), reasons for performing thyroid US, and completeness of reports regarding the description of the thyroid gland and nodules. In the case of multiple nodules, we considered the nodule suspected of malignancy and the largest one. To evaluate the accuracy of thyroid nodule description, we referred to the five characteristics suggested by the ACR TI-RADS system.
resultsA total of 341 patients with thyroid nodules received endocrine consultation (female, 78%). The most frequent reasons for performing thyroid US were unrelated to a suspected thyroid disease (31.7%), followed by incidentaloma (23.5%), dysfunction or positivity for thyroid antibodies (19.1%), symptomatic or visible nodules (17.6%), and family history of any thyroid disease (8.2%). Gland texture was not reported in 41.9%. The depth of the lobes was the dimension reported most frequently (42.2%), but any diameter was not reported in 57.8% of the cases. As regards the description of the most relevant nodule, length was reported more frequently (75.9%). Margins and echogenicity were more frequently described (54.5% and 44.3%, respectively) than other characteristics (composition: 27%; shape: 8.8%; echogenic foci: 6.7%). No reports had indicated the malignancy risk stratification.
conclusionsThe results of the study demonstrate that in patients undergoing endocrine consultation with first detected thyroid nodules, US was mostly performed in asymptomatic cases, US reports were incomplete, and no risk stratification system was reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36622626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.