Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36622464›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Changes in Radiologists' Gaze Patterns Against Lung X-rays with Different Abnormalities: a Randomized Experiment.

Ilya Pershin, Tamerlan Mustafaev, Dilyara Ibragimova, Bulat Ibragimov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Visual prior-guided masked image modeling enhances chest X-ray diagnostic efficacy].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Use of Machine Learning in Eye Tracking Studies in Medical Imaging: A Review.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ilya PershinInnopolis University, Republic of Tatarstan, Innopolis, Russia.
Tamerlan MustafaevInnopolis University, Republic of Tatarstan, Innopolis, Russia.
Dilyara IbragimovaKazan State University Clinic, Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, Russia.
Bulat IbragimovUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. bulat@di.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7739-7788
Innopolis University · RUKazan State Medical University · RUUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The workload of some radiologists increased dramatically in the last several, which resulted in a potentially reduced quality of diagnosis. It was demonstrated that diagnostic accuracy of radiologists significantly reduces at the end of work shifts. The study aims to investigate how radiologists cover chest X-rays with their gaze in the presence of different chest abnormalities and high workload. We designed a randomized experiment to quantitatively assess how radiologists' image reading patterns change with the radiological workload. Four radiologists read chest X-rays on a radiological workstation equipped with an eye-tracker. The lung fields on the X-rays were automatically segmented with U-Net neural network allowing to measure the lung coverage with radiologists' gaze. The images were randomly split so that each image was shown at a different time to a different radiologist. Regression models were fit to the gaze data to calculate the treads in lung coverage for individual radiologists and chest abnormalities. For the study, a database of 400 chest X-rays with reference diagnoses was assembled. The average lung coverage with gaze ranged from 55 to 65% per radiologist. For every 100 X-rays read, the lung coverage reduced from 1.3 to 7.6% for the different radiologists. The coverage reduction trends were consistent for all abnormalities ranging from 3.4% per 100 X-rays for cardiomegaly to 4.1% per 100 X-rays for atelectasis. The more image radiologists read, the smaller part of the lung fields they cover with the gaze. This pattern is very stable for all abnormality types and is not affected by the exact order the abnormalities are viewed by radiologists. The proposed randomized experiment captured and quantified consistent changes in X-ray reading for different lung abnormalities that occur due to high workload.

Indexed as

RadiologistsRadiologyHumansLungRadiographyX-RaysEye-trackingHuman-AI interactionLung fieldsRadiologist performanceU-Net

Identifiers

PMID36622464
PMCPMC9838425
OpenAlexW4313830072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.