Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36622456›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

Halo-pelvic traction in the treatment of severe scoliosis: a meta-analysis.

Yan Sun, Yong Zhang, Haoning Ma, Mingsheng Tan, Zhihai Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Role of temporary internal distraction in correcting severe and rigid spinal deformities: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Radiographic assessment and risk model of atlantoaxial instability induced by Halo-pelvic traction in treating severe spinal deformity.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan SunDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.5 Beixiange St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
Yong ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.5 Beixiange St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China.
Haoning MaDepartment of Orthopaedics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Mingsheng TanDepartment of Orthopaedics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China. zrtanms@163.com.
Zhihai ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, No.5 Beixiange St, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, People's Republic of China. gamzzh@163.com.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNGuang’anmen Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide better evidence of the efficacy and safety of preoperative halo-pelvic traction on the improvements of deformity and pulmonary functions in patients with severe scoliosis.

methodsElectronic database searches were conducted including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. All studies of halo-pelvic traction for the management of severe spinal deformity were included. We referred to a list of four criteria developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to assess the quality of included studies. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

resultsBased on the study selection criteria, a total of eight articles consisting of a total of 210 patients were included. Statistically significant differences were found in coronal Cobb angle (P < 0.001), sagittal Cobb angle (P < 0.001) and height (P < 0.001) between pre- and post-traction. Sensitivity analysis was conducted, and there were substantial changes in heterogeneity with preoperative thoracoplasty subgroup in coronal Cobb angle (P < 0.001). Three trials including 74 subjects reported FVC and FEV1 predicted value between pre- and post-traction. There were statistically significant differences in FVC, FVC%, FEV1 and FEV1% (P < 0.001). The complication rate was 6.6-26.7%, and symptoms disappeared after reasonable traction strategy and intensive care.

conclusionsPreoperative halo-pelvic traction achieved significant improvements in spinal deformity and pulmonary functions, with minor and curable complications. Thus, it is an effective and safe solution before surgery and may be the optimal choice for severe scoliosis. In light of the heterogeneity and limitations, future researches are needed to better determine the long-term efficacy on comprehensive assessment and to explore the appropriate traction system.

Indexed as

ScoliosisThoracoplastyDatabases, FactualHumansRetrospective StudiesSoftwareTractionTreatment OutcomeHalo-pelvic tractionMeta-analysisPulmonary functionRadiographic outcomeSevere scoliosis

Identifiers

PMID36622456
OpenAlexW4313826119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.