ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023
Intimate partner violence after cancer diagnosis: an SOS call.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Associations between IPV and non-communicable diseases: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Experiences of intimate partner violence among female cancer patients: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Breaking the Silence: Psychological Abuse Among Patients with Breast Cancer.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Caregiver Paradigm in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: Current and Future Directions.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Review
- Intimate partner violence in women with cancer: An integrative review.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the present study was to measure the frequency and types of IPV among patients with cancer and evaluate risk factors.
methodsThe study was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study, conducted between January and April 2022, including 141 patients treated with cancer regardless of gender, site, or stage. We developed the study questionnaire by adapting items from the "WHO multi-country questionnaire on violence against women" and "The Women's Experiences with Battering Scale." Odds ratio (OR) and spearman tests were performed to assess the impact of several factors associated with the reported IPV.
resultsMedian age was 50 years old, 38.3% were male cancer patients. IPV prevalence was 24.8%, we observed 5 cases of torture (3%). The most common forms of violence were placing severe restriction on certain types of food and clothing in 21%, psychological violence in 20%, exposing intimate information about the patient health status to others in 17%, ignoration in 13.5%, putting restrictions on visiting friends or families in 9.2%, verbal assault in 9.2%, physical violence in 7.9%, and 7.1% racist conducts. Financial violence was rare in 4.3%. There was no difference in the incidence of IPV between man and women. We observed a significant correlation between IPV prevalence and disease stage (19.1% M0 vs 34.6% M1, p=0.04, OR=2.2 [1-4.8]), patient's educational level (48.5% vs 17.6%, p=0.01, OR= 4.4 [1.8-10.2]), and being under ongoing cancer therapy (11.4% vs 30.9%, p=0.013, OR=3.4 [1.2-9.7])
conclusionPatients were shown to be victims of several forms of IPV regardless of gender.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36622425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.